Abstract
PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to investigate the process of how paradoxical leadership cultivates subordinates' paradox mindset.Design/methodology/approachThis study used the grounded theory approach. Data collection included semi-structured interviews and observations from eleven top managers and their six subordinates in five Chinese organizations. Managers and their subordinates were asked how they perceived and dealt with tensions in the workplace.FindingsParadoxical leadership promotes subordinates' paradox mindset by helping them learn to face, cope, and live with tensions. First, paradoxical leaders acted as role models for their subordinates and directly influenced followers' attitudes, motivation, and positive psychological states towards tensions. Moreover, when managers help their subordinates reduce stress and anxiety and build confidence, followers learn to cope with tensions. Consequently, subordinates' capacity to live with tensions is increased and they develop the paradox mindset.Practical implicationsThe results imply that reducing subordinates' stress and anxiety and building their confidence can be integrated into work practices and training, which provide insights for managers to cultivate their subordinates' paradox mindset.Originality/valueThis paper investigates how paradoxical leadership impacts and cultivates subordinates' paradox mindset in a tension-setting work environment. The findings not only provide fresh insights into the detailed process of developing employees' paradox mindset but also deepen the understanding of the leader–follower relationship.
Subject
Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management,Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous)
Reference33 articles.
1. Learning paradox: antecedents and mechanisms of paradox mindset development;Academy of Management Proceedings,2020
2. Charmaz, K., Smith, J.A. and Harré, R. (1995), “Grounded theory”, in Langenhove, L.V. (Ed.), Rethinking Methods in Psychology, Sage Publications, London, pp. 27-49.
3. Charmaz, K. and Belgrave, L. (2012), “Qualitative interviewing and grounded theory analysis”, in The SAGE Handbook of Interview Research: The Complexity of the Craft, 2nd ed., SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA, pp. 347-365.
4. Transcending paradox: the Chinese middle way perspective;Asia Pacific Journal of Management,2002
Cited by
8 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献