Author:
Kumar Shailendra,Asjad Mohammad,Suhaib Mohd.
Abstract
Purpose
This paper aims to put forward a labelling system capable of reflecting the level of different Industry 4.0 (I4.0)features present in a manufacturing system and further propose a comparative index to collectively estimate and compare the system automation level.
Design/methodology/approach
Data for the empirical study were collected from interactions with the practising managers and experts. A relationship among the six I4.0 features is developed with fuzzy cognitive maps.
Findings
The paper proposed a simple and easy-to-understand labelling system for I4.0 systems, which indicates the automation level in each of six dimensions of any manufacturing system. The system is further strengthened by a proposed automation comparative index (ACI), which collectively reflects the automation level on a scale of “0” to “1”. Thus, the labelling system and parameter could help in comparing the level of automation in the manufacturing system and further decision-making.
Research limitations/implications
Only seven industrial sectors are illustrated in the paper, but the proposed concept of the classification scheme and ACI find their applicability on a large spectrum of industries; thus, the concept can be extended to other industrial sectors. Furthermore, a threshold value of ACI is a differentiator between a I4.0 and other automated systems. Both aspects have the scope of further work.
Practical implications
The way and pace by which the industrial world takes forward the concept of I4.0, soon it will need a labelling system and a parameter to assess the automation level of any automated system. The scheme assesses the automation level present in a manufacturing system. It will also estimate the level of the presence of each of all six attributes of an I4.0 system. Both labelling system and ACI will be the practical tools in the hands of the practising managers to help compare, identify the thrust areas and make decisions accordingly.
Originality/value
To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this is the first study of its kind that proposed the labelling system and automation comparison index for I4.0 systems.
Subject
Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering,Computer Science Applications,Control and Systems Engineering
Reference57 articles.
1. Reconfigurable manufacturing on multiple levels: literature review and research directions;IFIP International Federation for Information Processing,2015
2. Industry 4.0 technologies assessment: a sustainability perspective;International Journal of Production Economics,2020
3. Pilot study of readiness of Czech companies to implement the principles of industry 4.0;Management and Production Engineering Review,2017
4. Bergström, A. and Jödicke, L. (2019), “Reconfigurability assessment model: assessment of a manufacturing system’s current state”, Production System, DiVA, id: diva2:1342529, ISRN: JU-JTH-PRS-2-20190059, URN: urn:nbn:se:hj:diva-45554, available at: www.divaportal.org/smash/record.jsf?pid=diva2%3A1342529anddswid=1892 (accessed on December 20, 2020)
5. Industry 4.0 disruption and its neologisms in major industrial sectors: a state of the art;Journal of Engineering,2020
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. A structural model of Welding 4.0 implementation challenges;International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing (IJIDeM);2023-12-12
2. An ISM and AHP-Based Analysis of Barriers to Healthcare 4.0;Journal of Industrial Integration and Management;2023-04-29
3. Design of Automatic Control System for Mechanical Manufacturing Based on Improved Genetic Algorithm;2023 Asia-Pacific Conference on Image Processing, Electronics and Computers (IPEC);2023-04-14
4. Industry 4.0 and Its Suitability in Post COVID-19;Journal of Industrial Integration and Management;2022-06-15
5. Development of an industry 4.0 transformability index for manufacturing systems;Industrial Robot: the international journal of robotics research and application;2022-01-27