Author:
Drechsler Salome,Leeflang Peter S.H.,Bijmolt Tammo H.A.,Natter Martin
Abstract
Purpose
The purpose of this paper is to compare the impact of different multi-unit promotions (MUPs) and a single-unit promotion (SUP) on store-level sales and consumer-level purchase probability and quantity decision.
Design/methodology/approach
The paper combines two empirical studies. Study 1 applies a hierarchical multiplicative model to store-level sales data for four product categories provided by a large Dutch retail chain. Study 2 presents a laboratory experiment in which the quantity requirements of the two focal MUP frames are manipulated to assess their impact on consumer purchase decisions.
Findings
The paper provides empirical evidence for the superiority of the “X for $Y” above “X + N free”, which confirms the hypotheses based on prospect theory, mental accounting and theory about gift-giving. Quantity requirements of four to five units show the largest effects. In addition, the superiority of the “X for $Y” frame holds for functional product categories, but not for the hedonic categories.
Practical implications
The paper provides managerial insights into the relative effectiveness of alternative MUPs and an SUP and how this promotional effectiveness depends on the type of product category and quantity requirements.
Originality/value
This paper combines actual sales data and experimental data. This “mixed approach” extends existing knowledge by comprehensively evaluating two MUP frames, namely, “X + N free” and “X for $Y” promotions, and an SUP.
Reference53 articles.
1. Conscious and nonconscious comparisons with price anchors: effects on willingness to pay for related and unrelated products;Journal of Marketing Research,2011
2. Promotion profitability for a retailer: the role of promotion, brand, category, and store characteristics;Journal of Marketing Research,2006
3. Estimating the SCAN*PRO model of store sales: HB, FM or just OLS?;International Journal of Research in Marketing,2008
4. Price promotion for emotional impact;Journal of Marketing,2014
5. Contextual influences on consumer price responses: an experimental analysis;Journal of Marketing Research,1980
Cited by
34 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献