Farm-level evidence on risk balancing behavior in the EU-15

Author:

de Mey Yann,van Winsen Frankwin,Wauters Erwin,Vancauteren Mark,Lauwers Ludwig,Van Passel Steven

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to present empirical evidence of risk balancing behavior by European farmers. More specifically, the authors investigate strategic adjustments in the level of financial risk (FR) in response to changes in the level of business risk (BR). Design/methodology/approach – The authors conducted a correlation relationship analysis and run several linear fixed effects regression models using the European Union (EU)-15 FADN panel data set for the period 1995-2008. Findings – Overall, the paper finds EU evidence of risk balancing. The correlation relationship analysis suggests that just over half of the farm observations are risk balancers whereas the other (smaller) half are not. The coefficient in our fixed effects regression suggests that a 1 percent increase in BR reduces FR by 0.043 percent and has a standard error so low that the existence of non-risk balancers is doubtful. The results reject evidence of strong-form risk balancing – inverse trade-offs between FR and BR keeping total risk (TR) constant – but cannot reject weak-form risk balancing – inverse trade-offs between FR and BR with some observed changes in TR. Furthermore, the extent of risk balancing behavior is found to differ between different European countries and across farm typologies. Practical implications – This study provides European policy makers a first insight into risk balancing behavior of EU farmers. When risk balancing occurs, BR-reducing agricultural policies induce strategic upwards leverage adjustments that unintentionally reestablish or even increase total farm-level risk. Originality/value – Making use of the large and unique FADN database, to the best of the authors knowledge, this study is the first that provides European (EU-15) evidence on risk balancing behavior, is conducted at an unprecedented large scale, and presents the first risk balancing evidence across countries and farming systems.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Agricultural and Biological Sciences (miscellaneous),Economics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous)

Reference29 articles.

1. Ahrendsen, B.L. , Collender, R.N. and Dixon, B.L. (1994), “An empirical analysis of optimal capital structure decisions”, Agricultural Finance Review, Vol. 54 No. 1, pp. 108-119.

2. Barry, P.J. (1983), “Financing growth and adjustment of farm firms under risk and inflation”, in Baum, K.H. and Schertz, L.P. (Eds), Modeling Farm Decisions for Policy Analysis, Westview Press, Boulder, CO, pp. 111-134.

3. Barry, P.J. and Robinson, L.J. (1987), “Portfolio theory and financial structure: an application of equilibrium analysis”, Agricultural Finance Review, Vol. 47 No. 1, pp. 142-151.

4. Barry, P.J. , Baker, C.B. and Sanint, L.R. (1981), “Farmers’ credit risks and liquidity management”, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Vol. 63 No. 2, pp. 216-227.

5. Collins, R.A. (1985), “Expected utility, debt-equity structure, and risk balancing”, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Vol. 67 No. 3, pp. 627-629.

Cited by 21 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3