Author:
Crawford Paul,Lewis Lydia,Brown Brian,Manning Nick
Abstract
PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to examine the value of approaches to mental health based on creative practice in the humanities and arts, and explore these in relation to the potential contribution to mutual recovery.Design/methodology/approachThe paper is a conceptual analysis and literature review.FindingsRecovery can embrace carers and practitioners as well as sufferers from mental health problems. Divisions tend to exist between those with mental health needs, informal carers and health, social care and education personnel. Mutual recovery is therefore a very useful term because it instigates a more fully social understanding of mental health recovery processes, encompassing diverse actors in the field of mental health. Research demonstrates the importance of arts for “recovery orientated mental health services”, how they provide ways of breaking down social barriers, of expressing and understanding experiences and emotions, and of helping to rebuild identities and communities. Similarly, the humanities can advance the recovery of health and well‐being.Originality/valueThe notion of mutual recovery through creative practice is more than just a set of creative activities which are believed to have benefit. The idea is also a heuristic that can be useful to professionals and family members, as well as individuals with mental health problems themselves. Mutual recovery is perhaps best seen as a relational construct, offering new opportunities to build egalitarian, appreciative and substantively connected communities – resilient communities of mutual hope, compassion and solidarity.
Subject
Psychiatry and Mental health
Reference77 articles.
1. Adame, A.L. and Knudson, R.M. (2007), “Beyond the counter‐narrative: exploring alternative narratives of recovery from the psychiatric survivor movement”, Narrative Inquiry, Vol. 17 No. 2, pp. 157‐78.
2. Amering, M. and Schmolke, M. (2009), Recovery in Mental Health, Wiley‐Blackwell, Oxford.
3. Appleby, L., May, P., Meiklejohn, C., Edgar, K. and Cummins, I. (2010), Prison Mental Health: Vision and Reality, Royal College of Nursing, London.
4. Baker, S., Brown, B.J. and Fazey, J. (2006), “Mental health and higher education: mapping field consensus and legitimation”, Critical Social Policy, Vol. 26 No. 1, pp. 31‐56.
5. Barker, P. (2000), The Tidal Model: From Theory to Practice, University of Newcastle, Newcastle.
Cited by
46 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献