Author:
Whyte Andrew,Donaldson James
Abstract
Purpose
– The use of digital-models to communicate civil-engineering design continues to generate debate; this pilot-work reviews technology uptake towards data repurposing and assesses digital (vs traditional) design-preparation timelines and fees for infrastructure. The paper aims to discuss these issues.
Design/methodology/approach
– Extending (building-information-modelling) literature, distribution-impact is investigated across: quality-management, technical-applications and contractual-liability. Project case-study scenarios were developed and validated with resultant modelling-application timeline/fees examined, in conjunction with qualitative semi-structured interviews with 11 prominent stakeholder companies.
Findings
– Results generated to explore digital-model data-distribution/usage identify: an 8 per cent time/efficiency improvement at the design-phase, and a noteworthy cost-saving of 0.7 per cent overall. Fragmented opinion regarding modelling utilisation exists across supply-chains, with concerns over liability, quality-management and, the lack of Australian-Standard contract-clause(s) dealing directly with digital-model document hierarchy/clarification/reuse.
Research limitations/implications
– Representing a small-scale/snapshot industrial-study, findings suggest that (model-distribution) must emphasise checking-procedures within quality-systems and, seek precedence clarification for dimensioned documentation. Similarly, training in specific file-formatting (digital-model-addenda) techniques, CAD-file/hard-copy continuity, and digital-visualisation software, can better regulate model dissemination/reuse. Time/cost savings through digital-model data-distribution in civil-engineering contracts are available to enhance provision of society’s infrastructure.
Originality/value
– This work extends knowledge of 3D-model distribution for roads/earthworks/drainage, and presents empirical evidence that (alongside appropriate consideration of general-conditions-of-contract and specific training to address revision-document continuity), industry may achieve tangible benefits from digital-model data as a means to communicate civil-engineering design.
Subject
Management Science and Operations Research,Civil and Structural Engineering
Reference27 articles.
1. ACIL Tasman
(2008), “The Value of Spatial Information”, available at: www.crcsi.com.au/Documents/ACILTasmanReport_full.aspx (accessed 3 November 2013).
2. Arayici, Y.
,
Coates, P.
,
Koskela, L.
,
Kagioglou, M.
,
Usher, C.
and
O’Reilly, K.
(2011), “BIM adoption and implementation for architectural practices”, Structural Survey 29.1 7-25.
3. Arensman, D.
(2012), “Building information modelling and potential legal issues”,
International Journal of Construction Education and Research
, Vol. 8 No. 2, pp. 146-156, available at: www.tandfonline.com.dbgw.lis.curtin.edu.au/doi/abs/10.1080/15578771.2011.617808 (accessed 3 November 2013).
4. Australian Standard General Conditions of Contract AS2124
(1992), “Constructs
&
Purchasing Services Pty Ltd”, available at: contracts.com.au
5. Australian Standard General Conditions of Contract AS4000
(1997), “Constructs
&
Purchasing Services Pty Ltd”, available at: contracts.com.au
Cited by
8 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献