Digital model data distribution in civil engineering contracts

Author:

Whyte Andrew,Donaldson James

Abstract

Purpose – The use of digital-models to communicate civil-engineering design continues to generate debate; this pilot-work reviews technology uptake towards data repurposing and assesses digital (vs traditional) design-preparation timelines and fees for infrastructure. The paper aims to discuss these issues. Design/methodology/approach – Extending (building-information-modelling) literature, distribution-impact is investigated across: quality-management, technical-applications and contractual-liability. Project case-study scenarios were developed and validated with resultant modelling-application timeline/fees examined, in conjunction with qualitative semi-structured interviews with 11 prominent stakeholder companies. Findings – Results generated to explore digital-model data-distribution/usage identify: an 8 per cent time/efficiency improvement at the design-phase, and a noteworthy cost-saving of 0.7 per cent overall. Fragmented opinion regarding modelling utilisation exists across supply-chains, with concerns over liability, quality-management and, the lack of Australian-Standard contract-clause(s) dealing directly with digital-model document hierarchy/clarification/reuse. Research limitations/implications – Representing a small-scale/snapshot industrial-study, findings suggest that (model-distribution) must emphasise checking-procedures within quality-systems and, seek precedence clarification for dimensioned documentation. Similarly, training in specific file-formatting (digital-model-addenda) techniques, CAD-file/hard-copy continuity, and digital-visualisation software, can better regulate model dissemination/reuse. Time/cost savings through digital-model data-distribution in civil-engineering contracts are available to enhance provision of society’s infrastructure. Originality/value – This work extends knowledge of 3D-model distribution for roads/earthworks/drainage, and presents empirical evidence that (alongside appropriate consideration of general-conditions-of-contract and specific training to address revision-document continuity), industry may achieve tangible benefits from digital-model data as a means to communicate civil-engineering design.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Management Science and Operations Research,Civil and Structural Engineering

Reference27 articles.

1. ACIL Tasman (2008), “The Value of Spatial Information”, available at: www.crcsi.com.au/Documents/ACILTasmanReport_full.aspx (accessed 3 November 2013).

2. Arayici, Y. , Coates, P. , Koskela, L. , Kagioglou, M. , Usher, C. and O’Reilly, K. (2011), “BIM adoption and implementation for architectural practices”, Structural Survey 29.1 7-25.

3. Arensman, D. (2012), “Building information modelling and potential legal issues”, International Journal of Construction Education and Research , Vol. 8 No. 2, pp. 146-156, available at: www.tandfonline.com.dbgw.lis.curtin.edu.au/doi/abs/10.1080/15578771.2011.617808 (accessed 3 November 2013).

4. Australian Standard General Conditions of Contract AS2124 (1992), “Constructs & Purchasing Services Pty Ltd”, available at: contracts.com.au

5. Australian Standard General Conditions of Contract AS4000 (1997), “Constructs & Purchasing Services Pty Ltd”, available at: contracts.com.au

Cited by 8 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3