The sharing economy and the transformation of work: evidence from Foodora

Author:

Geissinger Andrea,Laurell Christofer,Öberg Christina,Sandström Christian,Suseno YulianiORCID

Abstract

PurposeThis article explores the various stakeholders' perceptions of the ways digital work is organised within the sharing economy and the social implications of the transformation of work.Design/methodology/approachApplying social media analytics (SMA) concerning the sharing economy platform Foodora, a total of 3,251 user-generated content was collected and organised throughout the social media landscape in Sweden over 12 months, and 18 stakeholder groups were identified, discussing digital work within seven thematic categories.FindingsThe results show that the stakeholder groups in the Swedish context primarily expressed negative views of Foodora's way of organising digital work. The social media posts outlined the distributive and procedural justice related to the working conditions, boycott and protests and critical incidents, as well as the collective bargaining of Foodora.Originality/valueBy utilising a novel SMA method, this study contributes to the extant literature on the sharing economy by providing a systematic assessment concerning the impact of the sharing economy platform on the transformation of work and the associated social consequences.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management,Applied Psychology

Reference74 articles.

1. Beyond Uber and Airbnb: the social economy of collaborative consumption;Social Media + Society,2017

2. Promises and paradoxes of the sharing economy: an organizing framework;Technological Forecasting and Social Change,2017

3. Entrepreneurship and ethics in the sharing economy: a critical perspective;Journal of Business Ethics,2020

4. Bao, J. and Wu, A. (2017), “Equality and equity in compensation”, working Paper 17-093, Harvard Business School, available at: https://www.hbs.edu/faculty/Publication%20Files/17-093_b4f6e873-ad56-4f49-a6b8-0d7b50cd07ab.pdf (accessed September 2020).

5. Why not share rather than own?;Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science,2007

Cited by 16 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3