Putting people at the centre: facilitating Making Safeguarding Personal approaches in the context of the Care Act 2014

Author:

Butler Louise,Manthorpe Jill

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to describe and discuss the pilot Making Safeguarding Personal (MSP) project that ran in three London boroughs in England in 2014-2015. The project aimed to help local authority social work practitioners better engage with adults at risk at the beginning, middle and end of safeguarding work and to develop a more outcomes focused approach to safeguarding. Design/methodology/approach – Three adult social care teams volunteered to take part in the MSP pilot for four months, November 2014-February 2015. They were closely supported through telephone conferencing, bespoke training and individual mentoring. Evaluative data were collected from the participating teams about their work and the MSP change processes to assist in further implementation. Findings – The findings suggested that staff felt that the open discussions with adults at risk that were encouraged by the MSP initiative enabled safeguarding to be more effective and provided a better basis of support for adults at risk. The support from the project team was appreciated. Staff reported their own increased confidence as a result of involving adults at risk in decisions about their situations and risks of harm. They also reported their increased awareness of cross-cutting subjects related to adult safeguarding, such as domestic abuse and working with coercive and controlling behaviours. Permission to exercise greater professional discretion to make responses more considered, rather than the need to adhere to time-limited imperatives, was received positively. Staff felt that this enhanced discussions about resolution and recovery with adults at risk although it required greater expertise, more extensive managerial support, and more time. These were available in the pilot. Research limitations/implications – The MSP pilot was confined to three teams and took place over four months. The numerical data reported in this paper are provided for illustrative purposes and are not statistically significant. As with other evaluations of implementation, the data provided need to be set in the local contexts of population profiles, care settings and the reporting source. The pilot also took place during the early implementation of the Care Act 2014 which affected the context of practice and training. The views of adults at risk were not collected. There is a risk of bias in that participants may have wished to convey positive views of MSP to their colleagues. Practical implications – The paper indicates a need for the roll out of MSP philosophy and MSP approaches to be communicated with other agencies supporting adults at risk and for project support of some form to continue. It will be important to see if the overall enthusiasm, support and motivation reported by the pilot teams when taking a MSP approach in practice extend beyond a pilot period during which the staff received substantial support from a dedicated Professional Standards Safeguarding Team. Many of those staff participating in the pilot perceived the MSP approach as a return to core social work principles and welcomed putting these into practice. Originality/value – The paper provides details of one pilot in which the feasibility of the MSP approach was tested by supporting three frontline teams working in different contexts. The pilot suggests that the level and type of support offered to the pilot teams were effective in a variety of practice settings. It draws attention to the need for the MSP concept and approach to be shared with other agencies and for implementation support to continue beyond initial pilot period.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Law,Sociology and Political Science

Reference15 articles.

1. Cooper, A. , Lawson, J. , Lewis, S. and Williams, C. (2015), “Making safeguarding personal: learning and messages from the 2013/14 programme”, The Journal of Adult Protection , Vol. 17 No. 3, pp. 153-65.

2. Department of Health (2016), Care and Support Statutory Guidance (updated) , The Stationery Office, London, available at: www.gov.uk/government/publications/care-act-2014-part-1-factsheets/care-and-support-statutory-guidance-changes-in-march-2016 (accessed 14 June 2016).

3. Ettelt, S. and Mays, N. (2015), “Advice on commissioning external academic evaluations of policy pilots in health and social care”, discussion paper, PIRU, London, available at: www.piru.ac.uk/External%20Evaluations%20of%20Policy%20Pilots%202015-15.pdf (accessed 14 June 2016).

4. Ettelt, S. , Mays, N. and Allen, P. (2015), “The multiple purposes of policy piloting and their consequences: three examples from national health and social care policy in England”, Journal of Social Policy , Vol. 44 No. 2, pp. 319-37.

5. HSCIC (2014), “Personal social services adult social care survey, England, 2013-14”, Survey feedback report, HSCIC, Leeds, available at: www.hscic.gov.uk/media/13277/Adult-Social-Care-Survey-England-2013-14-Feedback-survey-report/pdf/ASCS_2013-14_SurveyFeedbackReport_v1.0.pdf (accessed 17 June 2016).

Cited by 17 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3