Abstract
Purpose
– Online collaboration – a required method for many problem-solving situations in today’s work environments – has many aspects that are not clearly understood or explored. One of them is how work styles, specifically leadership styles, within a seemingly homogeneous teams with no prior role assignments affects the process and outcomes of collaboration. The purpose of this paper is to investigate the aspect of online collaboration to learn how different leadership styles that may emerge impact collaborative work.
Design/methodology/approach
– The work described here employs a user study involving 84 participants in 42 pairs, working in one of the three conditions across two sessions. The three conditions are defined based on the amount and the kind of awareness provided to the team members: no awareness of personal or team progress (C1), awareness of personal progress (C2), and awareness of both personal and team progress (C3). The log and chat data from the sessions where these teams work in collecting relevant information for two different topics are collected and analysed.
Findings
– Quantitative and qualitative analyses indicate the difference among the three conditions with respect to these two leadership styles. Specifically, it is found that those with the team awareness provided to them (C3) exhibited the least amounts of leadership, keeping the team relatively symmetric. The democratic nature of such teams also fostered more diverse searching behaviour and less need for communication.
Originality/value
– The work reported here is a first attempt to shed light on two kinds of connections: individual and team awareness to leadership style, and leadership style to diversity of information exploration.
Subject
Library and Information Sciences,Information Systems
Reference29 articles.
1. Baggetta, M.
,
Han, H.
and
Andrews, K.T.
(2013), “Leading associations: how individual characteristics and team dynamics generate committed leaders”,
American Sociological Review
, Vol. 78 No. 4, pp. 544-573.
2. Borlund, P.
and
Ingwersen, P.
(1999), “The application of work tasks in connection with the evaluation of interactive information retrieval systems: empirical results”, in
Dunlop, M.
,
Draper, S.
,
van Rijsbergen, K.
and
Ruthven, I.
(Eds),
Proceedings of MIRA: Electronic Workshops in Computing
,
British Computing Society (BCS)
,
London
, pp. 29-46.
3. Boughzala, I.
,
de Vreede, G.-J.
and
Limayem, M.
(2012), “Team collaboration in virtual worlds: editorial to the special issue”,
Journal of the Association for Information Systems
, Vol. 13 No. 10, pp. 714-734.
4. Chen, C.C.
,
Yang, S.C.
,
Tsou, H.-Y.
and
Wu, J.
(2008), “Importance of diversified leadership roles in improving team effectiveness in a virtual collaboration learning environment”,
Educational Technology & Society
, Vol. 11 No. 1, pp. 304-321.
5. Chen, Z.B.
and
Lawson, R.B.
(1996), “Groupthink: deciding with the leader and the devil”,
Psychological Record
, Vol. 46 No. 4, pp. 581-590.
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献