Author:
Gao Daquan,Li Songsong,Zhou Yan
Abstract
Purpose
This study aims to propose a moderated mediation model to investigate the moderating effects of environmental, social and governance (ESG) performance on the relationship between inefficient investment and firm performance and the mediating effect of firms that participate in institutional research on the relationship between investment efficiency and performance. This study also analyses the heterogeneity of the corporate nature, intensity of industrial research and development (R&D), industrial competition and regional marketization.
Design/methodology/approach
This study uses a panel data fixed-effects model to conduct a regression analysis of 1,918 Chinese listed firms from 2016 to 2020. A Fisher’s permutation test is used to examine the differences between state-owned and nonstate-owned firms.
Findings
Inefficient investment negatively impacts corporate performance and higher ESG performance exacerbates this effect by attracting more institutional research which reveals more problems. State-owned enterprises perform significantly better than nonstate-owned enterprises in terms of ESG transformation. Industrial R&D intensity, competition and regional marketization also mitigate the negative effects of inefficient investment on corporate performance.
Practical implications
This study suggests that companies should consider inefficient investments that arise from agency issues in corporate ESG transformation. In addition, state-owned enterprises in ESG transformation should take the lead to achieve sustainable development more efficiently. China should balance regional marketization, encourage enterprises to increase R&D intensity, reduce industry concentration, encourage healthy competition and prevent market monopolies.
Originality/value
This study combines the agency and stakeholder theories to reveal how inefficient investments that arise from agency issues inhibit value creation in ESG initiatives.
Reference125 articles.
1. Empire-builders and shirkers: investment, firm performance, and managerial incentives;Journal of Corporate Finance,2006
2. Managerial overconfidence and accounting conservatism;Journal of Accounting Research,2013
3. Chief executive officers' monitoring, board effectiveness, managerial ownership, and cash holdings: evidence from ASEAN;Review of Managerial Science,2021
4. Environmental, social, and governance integration into the business model: literature review and research agenda;Sustainability,2022
5. Environmental, social and governance performance (ESG) and firm investment efficiency in emerging markets: the interaction effect of board cultural diversity;Corporate Governance-the International Journal of Business in Society,2023