“That's not how I see it”: female and male perspectives on the academic role

Author:

Shaw Sue,Cassell Catherine

Abstract

PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to provide a piece of empirical work that examines gender differences in how academics make sense of performance within university business schools in the UK.Design/methodology/approachThe research reported draws on data collected using a life history and repertory grid methodology with male and female interviewees from two university business schools.FindingsThe findings are discussed in relation to how academics understand what is valued about their role and what they believe the organisation rewards and values when it comes to promotion. Gender differences are shown to exist in the ways women and men define the academic role and in what they think is important both to themselves and the institution.Originality/valueThe paper presents original data on gender differences within a business school context.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous),Gender Studies

Reference63 articles.

1. Acker, S. (1992), “New perspectives on an old problem: the position of women academics in British Higher Education”, Higher Education, Vol. 24 No. 1, pp. 57‐75.

2. Ainley, P. (1998), “Higher education in a right state: professionalising the proletariat or proletarianising the professions”, in Jary, D. and Parker, M. (Eds), The New Higher Education, Stoke on Trent, Staffordshire University Press, Stafford, pp. 133‐50.

3. Aziz, A. (1990), “Women in UK universities: the road to casualization?”, in Stiver Lie, S. and O'Leary, V.E. (Eds), Storming the Ivory Tower, Women in the Academic World, Kogan, London, pp. 33‐46.

4. Bagihole, B. (1994), “Being different is a very difficult row to hoe: survival strategies of women academics”, in Davies, S., Lubelska, C. and Quinn, J. (Eds), Changing the Subject: Women in Higher Education, Taylor and Francis, London, pp. 15‐28.

5. Benn, R. and Fieldhouse, R. (1993), “Government policies on university expansion and wider access, 1945‐51 and 1985‐91 compared”, Studies in Higher Education, Vol. 18 No. 3, pp. 299‐313.

Cited by 9 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3