Generalising Darwinism to study socio‐cultural change

Author:

Breslin Dermot

Abstract

PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to critically evaluate the use of the evolutionary approach, and in particular the generalisation of Darwinian principles beyond biology to study socio‐cultural change.Design/methodology/approachThe paper presents a review of developments in generalising Darwinism to study socio‐cultural change, including key criticisms against using the approach. In the process key disagreements between the different conceptual approaches taken by evolutionary scholars, and key criticisms against using an evolutionary approach are highlighted.FindingsIt was seen that a number of critics fail to grasp the abstracted concept of Universal and Generalised Darwinism, focusing their arguments on detailed differences between socio‐cultural and biological evolution. Future research within the field should be directed towards building consensus regarding the definitions of key concepts, and using detailed empirical investigations to shed light on the usefulness of the different approaches taken for research and practice.Originality/valueThe key contribution of this paper is the presentation of a critical review of developments made in generalising Darwinism. It is further argued that the universal appeal of the approach offers researchers an opportunity for cross‐fertilising ideas, generating new insights across disciplines and learning from developments being made in parallel fields of study.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

General Economics, Econometrics and Finance,Sociology and Political Science

Reference47 articles.

1. Aldrich, H.E. (1999), Organizations Evolving, Sage Publishing, London.

2. Aldrich, H.E., Hodgson, G.M., Hull, D.L., Knudsen, T., Mokyr, J. and Vanberg, V.J. (2008), “In defence of generalized Darwinism”, Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Vol. 18, pp. 577‐96.

3. Barkow, J.H. (1992), “Beneath new culture is old psychology: gossip and social stratification”, in Barkow, J.H., Cosmides, L. and Tooby, J. (Eds), The Adapted Mind: Evolutionary Psychology and the Generation of Culture, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 627‐37.

4. Baum, J. and Singh, J. (1994), “Organizational hierarchies and evolutionary processes: some reflections on a theory of organizational evolution”, in Baum, J. and Singh, J. (Eds), Evolutionary Dynamics of Organisations, Oxford University Press, New York, NY, pp. 3‐22.

5. Becker, M.C. (2004), “Organizational routines: a review of the literature”, Industrial and Corporate Change, Vol. 13 No. 4, pp. 643‐77.

Cited by 15 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3