Abstract
PurposeThis study aims to compare and contrast the core organisational processes across high and low performing mental health providers in the English National Health Service (NHS).Design/methodology/approachA multiple case study qualitative design incorporating a full sample of low and high performing mental health providers.FindingsThis study suggests that the organisational approaches used to govern and manage mental health providers are associated with their performance, and the study’s findings give clues as to what areas might need attention. They include, but are not limited to: developing appropriate governance frameworks and organisational cultures, ensuring that staff across the organisation feel “psychologically safe” and able to speak up when they see things that are going wrong; a focus on enhancing quality of services rather than prioritising cost-reduction; investing in new technology and digital applications; and nurturing positive inter-organisational relationships across the local health economy.Originality/valueHighlights considerable divergence in organisation and management practices that are associated with the performance of mental health trusts in the English NHS
Subject
Health Policy,Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous)
Reference36 articles.
1. Extending the evaluation space: incorporating non-health benefits into healthcare provider performance assessment,2022
2. Why do some interorganisational collaborations in healthcare work when others do not? A realist review;BMC Systematic Reviews,2021
3. An abductive approach to qualitative built environment research: a viable system methodological expose;Qualitative Research Journal,2017
4. A qualitative positive deviance study to explore exceptionally safe care on medical wards for older people;BMJ Quality,2019
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献