Organisational drivers of performance in mental health providers

Author:

Mannion RussellORCID,Konteh Frederick Hassan,Jacobs RowenaORCID

Abstract

PurposeThis study aims to compare and contrast the core organisational processes across high and low performing mental health providers in the English National Health Service (NHS).Design/methodology/approachA multiple case study qualitative design incorporating a full sample of low and high performing mental health providers.FindingsThis study suggests that the organisational approaches used to govern and manage mental health providers are associated with their performance, and the study’s findings give clues as to what areas might need attention. They include, but are not limited to: developing appropriate governance frameworks and organisational cultures, ensuring that staff across the organisation feel “psychologically safe” and able to speak up when they see things that are going wrong; a focus on enhancing quality of services rather than prioritising cost-reduction; investing in new technology and digital applications; and nurturing positive inter-organisational relationships across the local health economy.Originality/valueHighlights considerable divergence in organisation and management practices that are associated with the performance of mental health trusts in the English NHS

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Health Policy,Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous)

Reference36 articles.

1. Extending the evaluation space: incorporating non-health benefits into healthcare provider performance assessment,2022

2. Why do some interorganisational collaborations in healthcare work when others do not? A realist review;BMC Systematic Reviews,2021

3. An abductive approach to qualitative built environment research: a viable system methodological expose;Qualitative Research Journal,2017

4. A qualitative positive deviance study to explore exceptionally safe care on medical wards for older people;BMJ Quality,2019

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3