From translational research to open technology innovation systems

Author:

Savory Clive,Fortune Joyce

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to question whether the emphasis placed within translational research on a linear model of innovation provides the most effective model for managing health technology innovation. Several alternative perspectives are presented that have potential to enhance the existing model of translational research. A case study is presented of innovation of a clinical decision support system. The paper concludes from the case study that an extending the triple helix model of technology transfer, to one based on a quadruple helix, present a basis for improving the performance translational research. Design/methodology/approach – A case study approach is used to help understand development of an innovative technology within a teaching hospital. The case is then used to develop and refine a model of the health technology innovation system. Findings – The paper concludes from the case study that existing models of translational research could be refined further through the development of a quadruple helix model of heath technology innovation that encompasses greater emphasis on user-led and open innovation perspectives. Research limitations/implications – The paper presents several implications for future research based on the need to enhance the model of health technology innovation used to guide policy and practice. Practical implications – The quadruple helix model of innovation that is proposed can potentially guide alterations to the existing model of translational research in the healthcare sector. Several suggestions are made for how innovation activity can be better supported at both a policy and operational level. Originality/value – This paper presents a synthesis of the innovation literature applied to a theoretically important case of open innovation in the UK National Health Service. It draws in perspectives from other industrial sectors and applies them specifically to the management and organisation of innovation activities around health technology and the services in which they are embedded.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Health Policy,Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous)

Reference78 articles.

1. Adams, R. , Tranfield, D. and Denyer, D. (2013), “Process antecedents of challenging, under-cover and readily-adopted innovations”, Journal of Health Organization and Management , Vol. 27 No. 1, pp. 42-63.

2. Arnkil, R. , Järvensivu, A. , Koski, P. and Piirainen, T. (2010), “Exploring the Quadruple Helix”, report of Quadruple Helix Research for the CLIQ Project, Work Research Centre, University of Tampere, Tampere.

3. Baldwin, C.Y. and Von Hippel, E. (2010), “Modeling a paradigm shift: from producer innovation to user and open collaborative innovation”, Harvard Business School Finance Working Paper No. 10-038, Boston, available at: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1502864 ; http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1502864 (accessed 4 March 2015).

4. Barley, S.R. (1986), “Technology as an occasion for structuring: evidence from observations of CT scanners and the social order of radiology departments”, Administrative Science Quarterly , Vol. 31 No. 1, p. 78.

5. Buist, M.D. (2005), “System and process for facilitating the provision of health care”, IP Australia (Ed.), available at: http://pericles.ipaustralia.gov.au/ols/auspat/pdfSource.do? (accessed 30 July 2014).

Cited by 15 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3