Author:
Burgstaller Johann,Wagner Eva
Abstract
Purpose
– The purpose of this paper s to study the financing behavior of family firms (FF), as these differ from their small- and medium-sized enterprise (SME) counterparts in their capital structure decision, mainly due to an increased risk aversion and the desire to maintain control over the firm.
Design/methodology/approach
– A sample of 470 SMEs from a bank-based environment is examined for the period of 2005-2010. A dynamic panel data model is utilized to assess both the role of several capital structure determinants and the target-adjusting behavior for different subsamples of firms.
Findings
– The results show that FF, whether controlled by founders or not, are relatively more leveraged. The aim to maintain long-term control and limited financing options and other factors seem crucial to the observed differences in leverage and dominate risk considerations associated with higher debt. Presumed differences in agency costs across generations do not drive capital structure decisions, as overall leverage does not differ between founder- and descendant-controlled family firms (FCFF and DCFF, respectively). Firms with a founder-chief executive officer (CEO), however, adjust faster to deviations from a target debt ratio. The effects of many proposed capital structure determinants differ across firm types, but are highly consistent with predictions from the pecking order theory.
Practical implications
– Based on the results of this study, we suggest policy-makers in bank-based economies like Austria to strongly focus on mechanisms that facilitate the access to bank debt to ensure adequate allocation of finances to SMEs. This is especially important to stimulate growth and further innovation for the dominant group of FF, as they rely on debt the most to maintain family control.
Originality/value
– This paper makes a novel contribution to the literature, as it combines an analysis of the capital structure of non-listed family firms (NFF) in a bank-based economy, the respective role of founder management, the dynamic adjustment to a presumed debt target and joint tests of capital structure theories.
Reference91 articles.
1. Amihud, Y.
and
Lev, B.
(1981), “Risk reduction as a managerial motive for conglomerate mergers”,
Bell Journal of Economics
, Vol. 12 No. 2, pp. 605-617.
2. Ampenberger, M.
,
Schmid, T.
,
Achleitner, A.-K.
and
Kaserer, C.
(2013), “Capital structure decisions in family firms: empirical evidence from a bank-based economy”,
Review of Managerial Science
, Vol. 7 No. 3, pp. 247-275.
3. Anderson, R.C.
,
Mansi, S.A.
and
Reeb, D.M.
(2003), “Founding family ownership and the agency cost of debt”,
Journal of Financial Economics
, Vol. 68 No. 2, pp. 263-285.
4. Anderson, R.C.
and
Reeb, D.M.
(2003), “Founding-family ownership, corporate diversification, and firm leverage”,
Journal of Law and Economics
, Vol. 46 No. 2, pp. 653-684.
5. Ang, J.S.
(1992), “On the theory of finance for privately held firms”,
Journal of Small Business Finance
, Vol. 1 No. 3, pp. 185-203.
Cited by
80 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献