Author:
Apergis Nicholas,Christou Christina,Hassapis Christis
Abstract
Purpose
– This paper aims to explore convergence of accounting standards across worldwide adopted measures to investigate whether countries that have not completely adopted International Accounting Standards across the globe have displayed a tendency to act so.
Design/methodology/approach
– The new panel convergence methodology, developed by Phillips and Sul (2007), is employed.
Findings
– The empirical findings suggest that countries form distinct convergent clubs, albeit on a limited prevalence, yielding support to the notion that on a global basis firms and countries have initiated processes that will eventually lead them to a uniform pattern of employing common accounting standards.
Practical implications
– These findings have substantial implications on a firm level, mainly for differences in accounting quality as well as for differences in their cost of capital, thus leading the regulatory authorities to opt for further improvements in financial reporting.
Originality/value
– The novelties of this paper first, stem from the fact that it is the first time in the relevant literature that an empirical study attempts to formally measure whether the accounting world exhibits a tendency for accounting standards convergence or whether tactics and policies remain stagnant, acquiring drastic policy measures to speed up the convergence process. In addition, this study employs the implementation of the new methodology of panel convergence testing. This methodology has several appealing characteristics.
Reference47 articles.
1. Ahmed, A.S.
,
Neel, M.
and
Wang, D.
(2010), “Does mandatory adoption of IFRS improve accounting quality? Preliminary evidence”, Working Paper, TX A & M University.
2. Andrews, D.W.K.
(1991), “Heteroskedasticity and autocorrelation consistent covariance matrix estimation” Econometrica, Vol. 59, pp. 817-858.
3. Ashbaugh, H.
and
Pincus, M.
(2001), “Domestic accounting standard, international accounting standards, and the predictability of earnings” Journal of Accounting Research, Vol. 39 No. 3, pp. 417-434.
4. Ball, R.
(2006), “International financial reporting standards (IFRS): pros and cons for investors” Accounting and Business Research, Vol. 36, 5-27.
5. Ball, R.
and
Shivakumar, L.
(2005), “Earnings quality in UK private firms: comparative loss recognition timeliness” Journal of Accounting and Economics, Vol. 39 No. 1, pp. 83-128.
Cited by
6 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献