Author:
Fischer Bruno Brandão,Molero José
Abstract
Purpose
– The purpose of this paper is to verify the impacts of the transaction costs rationale on economic agents’ innovative results when they engage in European R
&
D networks, supplying both firms and policymakers with empirical support for improved decision making toward economic competitiveness and construction of the European research area. Furthermore, unlike many transaction cost economics assessments, the authors evaluate the existence of transaction costs following a dynamic framework of analysis (instead of using solely ex ante governance choice as a driver of inter-firm “friction” management), offering a novel perspective on these phenomena.
Design/methodology/approach
– Data consist of firm-level information from Eureka’s Final Reports (1995-2006) for Spanish, Italian, French, British and German firms. Empirical assessments were performed through a two-step approach of direct and indirect effects of network management and potential sources of disturbances. Ordinal regressions were applied in order to identify transaction costs’ relevance as drivers of firms’ technological and commercial outcomes, as well as on managerial quality of alliances. Statistical controls include microeconomic and project-specific variables.
Findings
– Results highlight the role played by transactional aspects as drivers of companies’ outcomes and managerial complexity. Furthermore, the authors find robust evidence that formal ex ante governance structures are incapable of satisfactorily addressing dynamic disturbances that take place within R
&
D networks. Whereas such findings are directly related to existing transaction costs, the authors find no support for the usual variables attributed to increased complexity in international inter-firm relationships.
Research limitations/implications
– Self-selection issues are inherently related to the research instrument (i.e. Eureka’s Reports), while further firm-level data could not be obtained since confidentiality issues protected companies’ names and sectors. Also, network-level data are not available, allowing the evaluation of individual perceptions only.
Originality/value
– While literature addresses the issue of transaction costs in R
&
D networks via theoretical assumptions and rough proxies, this assessment offers an in-depth evaluation of a set of valuable indicators with direct implications for researchers, managers and policymakers. Main contributions concern the identification of dynamic interactions (and their respective disturbances) as a key feature of the overall performance of R
&
D networks, stressing the non-linearity of economic processes in these hybrid relationships, an issue that has been poorly tackled by previous empirical investigations.
Subject
Management of Technology and Innovation
Reference80 articles.
1. Adler, P.
and
Shenhar, A.
(1990), “Adapting your technological base: the organizational challenge”,
Sloan Management Review
, Vol. 32 No. 1, pp. 25-37.
2. Ahuja, G.
(2000), “The duality of collaboration: inducements and opportunities in the formation of inter-firm linkages”,
Strategic Management Journal
, Vol. 21 No. 3, pp. 317-343.
3. Anderson, M.
(1995), “The role of collaborative integration in industrial organization: observations from the Canadian aerospace industry”,
Economic Geography
, Vol. 71 No. 1, pp. 55-78.
4. Archibugi, D.
and
Iammarino, S.
(1999), “The policy implications of the globalization of innovation”,
Research Policy
, Vol. 28 No. 3, pp. 317-336.
5. Arnold, E.
(2012), “Understanding long-term impacts of R
&
D funding: the EU framework programme”,
Research Evaluation
, Vol. 21 No. 5, pp. 332-343.