Author:
McAdam Rodney,Hazlett Shirley-Ann,Galbraith Brendan
Abstract
Purpose
– Market deregulation in the utilities sector has led to increased competition and rising customer expectations in both established and new markets. This, in turn, has forced organisations such as electricity and telecoms to make rapid, enterprise-wide changes on an increasingly frequent basis which in turn has led to problems with alignment. Misalignment can occur at many levels and can result in misused resources, loss of competitiveness, excessive cycle times, higher costs and loss of agility. The purpose of this paper is twofold. Given the lack of overarching theory, the paper begins by borrowing from contingency, dynamic capability and organisational learning constructs, to explore the role that performance measurement models can bring to improve the alignment between business strategy and functional strategy (level 1 alignment). Second, the paper analyses the role of performance measurement models in developing functional practices aligned with supply chain management (SCM) strategies (level 2 alignment).
Design/methodology/approach
– The study adopts an exploratory theory-building approach using four case studies. These are used as key supply chains in both established and new business areas within two longitudinal university-industry research partnerships (each of three years duration). Data from repeat interviews (n=42), focus groups (n=10), documentation and observations is analysed and forms the basis for the development of a conceptual framework and a set of related propositions. The data analysis followed Radnor and Boaden's (2004) method for analysing interpretive research.
Findings
– The findings show the role and impact of performance measurement models and methods on alignment at two levels, i.e. level 1 alignment – between business strategy and functional (SCM) strategy, and level 2 alignment – between the functional strategy (SCM) and SCM routines and practices.
Originality/value
– To date, there are few studies which explore the development of theory and practice in relation to the role and impact of performance measurement models and methods in improving organisational alignment. This exploratory theory building study makes a contribution to this gap through the development of the conceptual framework and propositions.
Subject
Management of Technology and Innovation,Strategy and Management,General Decision Sciences
Reference54 articles.
1. Alvesson, M.
and
Skoldberg, K.
(2009), Reflexive Methodology, Sage, London.
2. Ambrosini, V.
,
Bowman, C.
and
Collier, N.
(2009), “Dynamic capabilities: an exploration of how firms renew their resource base”, British Journal of Management, Vol. 20 No. 5, pp. 9-24.
3. Argyris, C.
and
Schön, D.
(1978), Organizational Learning: A Theory of Action Perspective, Addison Wesley, Reading, MA.
4. Baier, C.
,
Hartmann, E.
and
Moser, R.
(2008), “Strategic alignment and purchasing efficiency: an exploratory analysis of their impact on financial performance”, Journal of Supply Chain Management, Vol. 44 No. 4, pp. 36-52.
5. Barratt, M.
,
Choi, T.
and
Li, M.
(2011), “Qualitative case studies in operations management: trends, research outcomes, and future research implications”, Journal of Operations Management, Vol. 29 No. 4, pp. 329-342.
Cited by
15 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献