Reforming schools: the collective doubting perspective

Author:

Schechter Chen,Ganon-Shilon Sherry

Abstract

Purpose – The ongoing challenge to sustain educational reforms requires a learning process through which doubt is induced as a means of fostering productive school change. The purpose of this paper is to explore the concept of doubt as well as the doubting process and its importance to the school community, particularly with regard to educational reforms. Design/methodology/approach – After discussing the notions of doubt and the doubting process in the context of school reform, collective doubting in school administration is presented, accompanied by empirical illustrations. Findings – Whereas existing change management literature acknowledges resistance to change as a negative phenomenon, doubt and doubting – questioning the taken-for-granted need for reform and the way the reform should be carried out – is conceptualized as a positive and constructive phenomenon, a source for collective learning. The paper presents limitations, implications, and avenues for future research regarding the doubting process in the context of school reform. Originality/value – The collective doubting perspective has been sorely under investigated in the educational context. The constructive reform framework of collective doubting may help schools and policy makers develop and sustain educational reforms to foster continuous growth within students and practitioners alike.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management,Education,Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management,Education

Reference62 articles.

1. Achinstein, B. (2002), “Conflict amid community: the micropolitics of teacher collaboration”, Teachers College Record , Vol. 104 No. 3, pp. 421-455.

2. Alabi, A.O. and Okemakinde, T. (2010), “Effective planning as a factor of educational reform and innovation in Nigeria”, Current Research Journal of Social Sciences , Vol. 2 No. 6, pp. 316-321.

3. Argote, L. and Epple, D. (1990), “Learning curves in manufacturing”, Science , Vol. 23 No. 247, pp. 920-924.

4. Bogdan, R.C. and Biklen, S.K. (1992), Qualitative Research for Education: An Introduction to Theory and Methods , Allyn and Bacon, Boston, MA.

5. Bolman, L. and Deal, T. (1984), Modern Approaches to Understanding and Organizing Organizations , Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA.

Cited by 8 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3