The triple helix and the quality of the startup ecosystem: a global view

Author:

Flechas Ximena AlejandraORCID,Kazunari Takahashi CarlosORCID,Bastos de Figueiredo Júlio CésarORCID

Abstract

PurposeThe ongoing business dynamics show two aspects for generating innovation: first, high-impact innovations are developed jointly by several actors, such as universities, enterprises, and governments. Second, startups are better suited to develop innovation during crises or periods of low growth as experienced at the moment. Based on these aspects and drawing on the constructs of the triple helix, this study analyzes the influence between the characteristics of the actors on the quality of the startup ecosystem from a global view.Design/methodology/approachThe study examines the cross-section data of 35 countries between 2017 and 2018 and applies the partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) for assessing the relationships between the triple helix on the quality of the startup ecosystem on a country-level.FindingsThe findings suggest that each actor of the triple helix individually does not positively affect the quality of the startup ecosystem. Yet, when analyzing the actors jointly by creating a second-order latent variable (i.e. triple helix), the study found out that in this way, the triple helix construct has a positive effect on the quality of the startup ecosystem.Originality/valueAlthough a large body of prior literature indicates the importance of generating interrelationships among the different entities involved in ecosystems, few studies provide empirical evidence from a global perspective of the need for these entities to act in an overlapping manner. The present study supports previous research and reinforces the importance of the triple helix for a more innovative environment.

Publisher

Emerald

Reference52 articles.

1. The lineages of the entrepreneurial ecosystem approach;Small Business Economics,2017

2. Governance, triple-helix and Covid-19 management in Nigeria;Journal of Public Administration, Finance and Law,2020

3. Ecosystem as structure: An actionable construct for strategy;Journal of Management,2017

4. The anchor tenant hypothesis: Exploring the role of large, local, R&D-intensive firms in regional innovation systems;International Journal of Industrial Organization,2003

5. Why are some regions more innovative than others? The role of small firms in the presence of large labs;Journal of Urban Economics,2014

Cited by 6 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Czynniki skutecznej współpracy w modelu potrójnej helisy w ujęciu SEM;Przegląd Organizacji;2023-12-30

2. Analysis of entrepreneurial ecosystem factors on productive entrepreneurship of digital start-ups in Indonesia;International Journal of Business Ecosystem & Strategy (2687-2293);2023-07-30

3. Digital Innovation Ecosystem on Digital Entrepreneur;International Journal of E-Entrepreneurship and Innovation;2023-03-03

4. Perception of entrepreneurship as alternative to facing the post-pandemic crisis;Revista de Gestão e Secretariado;2023-01-19

5. The Model of Organisation of Green Entrepreneurship and the Climate-Responsible Management of Production Factors in the Digital Economy Markets;Smart Green Innovations in Industry 4.0 for Climate Change Risk Management;2023

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3