Abstract
The aim of this project was to compare the intentions with reported action of health Trusts in Scotland to prioritise and implement published SIGN clinical guidelines. All health Trusts in Scotland were asked about plans for implementation, and resurveyed 15‐18 months later for confirmation. Specific guideline implementation groups led by medical doctors were the most common implementation structure. Implementation usually consisted of baseline audit, development of a local version, and reaudit. In one case a successful link between acute and primary care through an area level GP audit facilitator was thought to increase implementation. More research is required to: find out what influences the ability of an organisation to implement guidelines; identify particular facilitating factors or barriers; and on factors influencing the ability of a health organisation to implement guidelines.
Subject
Health Policy,General Business, Management and Accounting
Reference20 articles.
1. Davies, H.T.O. and Crombie, I.K. (1997, “What’s a healthy outcome?”, Health Service Journal, Vol. 107 No. 5548, pp. 22‐5.
2. Durande‐Zaleski, I., Collin, C. and Blum‐Boisgard, C. (1997, “An attempt to save money by using mandatory practice guidelines in France”, British Medical Journal, Vol. 315, pp. 943‐46.
3. Ellis, P.M., Blackshaw, G., Purdie, G.L. et al. (1991), “Clinical information in psychiatric practice ‐ what do doctors know, what do they think is known and what do they record?”, Medical Education, Vol. 25 No. 5, pp. 438‐43.
4. Goldman, R.L. (1992, “The reliability of peer assessments of quality of care.”, JAMA, Vol. 267 No. 7, pp. 958‐60.
5. Grimshaw, J. and Russell, I. (1993, “Effect of clinical guidelines on medical practice: a systematic review of rigorous evaluations”, Lancet, Vol. 342, pp. 1317‐22.