Author:
Rothe Peggie,Lindholm Anna‐Liisa,Hyvönen Ari,Nenonen Suvi
Abstract
PurposeThe work environment has been identified to influence employee satisfaction and work performance. In order to develop and provide work environments that meet the preferences of as many employees as possible, more information about user preferences and possible preference differences between different kinds of users is required. The purpose of this paper is to increase the understanding concerning office users' work environment preferences. The aim is to investigate whether there are differences in the preferences of office users based on their age, gender, their mobility, and whether they work individually or with others.Design/methodology/approachOffice users' work environment preferences are studied through a survey directed to office employees. Statistical analysis is used in order to identify work environment preference differences between respondents of different age, gender, and the way they work.FindingsThe results indicate that there are differences between office users' work environment preferences concerning some characteristics of the work environment. The results show that the preferences vary both based on demographic issues such as age and gender as well as based on how they work.Research limitations/implicationsThe research is limited to the Helsinki Metropolitan Area, Finland, so the cultural context has to be taken into account when generalising the results.Originality/valueThe paper provides several stakeholders, such as user organisations, designers, consultants, and investors, valuable information on what kind of work environments office users prefer.
Subject
Finance,General Business, Management and Accounting
Reference26 articles.
1. Appel‐Meulenbroek, R. (2008), “Managing ‘keep’ factors of office tenants to raise satisfaction and loyalty”, Property Management, Vol. 26 No. 1, pp. 43‐55.
2. Batenburg, R.S. and Van der Voordt, T.J.M. (2008), “Do facilities matter?”, EFMC 2008 Conference Proceedings, Manchester, UK.
3. Bradley, S.J. (2002), “What's working? Briefing and evaluating workplace performance improvement”, Journal of Corporate Real Estate, Vol. 4 No. 2, pp. 150‐9.
4. Brunia, S. and Hartjes‐Gosselink, A. (2009), “Personalization in non‐territorial offices: a study of a human need”, Journal of Corporate Real Estate, Vol. 11 No. 3, pp. 169‐82.
5. Erlich, A. and Bichard, J. (2008), “The welcoming workplace: designing for ageing knowledge workers”, Journal of Corporate Real Estate, Vol. 10 No. 4, pp. 273‐85.
Cited by
22 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献