Joint procurement of complex products: actual price savings, perceived nonmonetary advantages, disadvantages and impediments

Author:

Carrera Pricivel,Katik Sükran,Schotanus Fredo

Abstract

Purpose Little is known about actual price savings generated by cooperative purchasing and nonmonetary advantages, disadvantages and impediments for the cooperative purchasing of complex or high-risk purchases. This paper aims to explore these topics by studying joint purchasing of pacemakers in The Netherlands. Design/methodology/approach To evaluate the magnitude of price savings, data on individual and collective prices for 18 hospitals was analyzed. In addition, 16 interviews were carried out with representatives of hospitals that participated and did not participate in the joint purchase. Findings Based on quantitative and qualitative data, the authors found large differences in price savings which can be attributed to scale, but mostly to knowledge of the group and renewing a contract in a technology-driven and developing market. Limited product choice – because of an organization joining a cooperative – constrained the attractiveness of cooperative purchasing, as end users may have specific product preferences. The consideration of preferences of end users is important toward successful joint purchasing of complex items. Social implications The authors argue that price savings because of scale are about 7% for smaller organizations and 4% for larger organizations. For smaller organizations with low specific knowledge and capacity for buying complex products, economies of process and knowledge are more important reasons for joining a purchasing group than scale. For large organizations with high specific knowledge and capacity, scale is the most important reason. Originality/value This study combined qualitative and quantitative perspectives, using actual spend data, to investigate cooperative purchasing of high-risk or complex purchases. On the one hand, more insight into the magnitude and reasons for price savings is provided than in earlier literature. On the other hand, more insight is given in qualitative reasons for joining a group and challenges for cooperative purchasing of complex items.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Public Administration

Reference41 articles.

1. Algemeen Dagblad (AD) (2015). “Hospital top 100”, available at: www.ad.nl/ad/nl/1401/tests/integration/nmc/frameset/varia/ziekenhuistest_2014.dhtml (accessed 3 February 2015).

2. Strategic sourcing;The International Journal of Logistics Management,1998

3. Choosing an organizational form: the case of collaborative procurement initiatives;International Journal of Procurement Management,2008

4. Library purchasing consortia: the UK periodicals supply market;Learned Publishing,2000

5. The performance of group purchasing organizations (GPOs) in the health care value chain,2014

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Paradox of GPO size and a hospital’s relative power for purchasing efficiency and the moderating role of system membership;International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management;2024-06-03

2. Procurement under pressure: shifting governance strategies in turbulent times;Public Management Review;2023-11-15

3. Organizing Public Procurement;Public Procurement;2023

4. Capturing the value creation in public procurement: A practice-based view;Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management;2022-03

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3