Abstract
Purpose
– The paper aims to empirically examine the questions of how top management team (TMT) characteristics, including TMT heterogeneity and vertical dyads differences between TMT and Board Director, influence entrepreneurial strategic orientation, as well as how industry environment and corporate ownership moderate those relationships.
Design/methodology/approach
– The paper designs the panel data on the listed companies of China's Small and Medium-sized Enterprises Board for the period 2006-2010, and uses hierarchical regression analysis and grouping regression analysis when examining the relationships among variables involved.
Findings
– The paper provides empirical insights about how top management team (TMT) characteristics, including TMT heterogeneity and vertical dyads differences between TMT and Board Director, influence entrepreneurial strategic orientation, as well as how industry environment and corporate ownership moderate those relationships. It suggests that, except for TMT educational background, the heterogeneity of TMT age, gender, functional experience, and the vertical dyad differences between TMT and board chairperson significantly and positively impact ESO. Furthermore, industry environment and corporate ownership will moderate the relationship between TMT characteristics and ESO.
Originality/value
– This paper fulfills an identified need to study how top management team characteristics influence entrepreneurial strategic orientation, as well as how industry environment and corporate ownership moderate those relationships.
Subject
Management Science and Operations Research,General Business, Management and Accounting
Reference120 articles.
1. Adams, R.B.
and
Ferreira, D.
(2009), “Women in the boardroom and their impact on governance and performance”, Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 94 No. 2, pp. 291-309.
2. Amason, A.C.
(1996), “Distinguishing the effect of functional and dysfunctional conflict on strategic decision making: resolving a paradox for top management teams”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 39 No. 1, pp. 123-148.
3. Amason, A.C.
,
Shrader, R.C.
and
Tompson, G.H.
(2006), “Newness and novelty: relating top management team composition to new venture performance”, Journal of Business Venturing, Vol. 21 No. 1, pp. 125-148.
4. Arthur, B.
(1996), “Increasing returns and the new world of business”, Harvard Business Review, Vol. 74 No. 4, pp. 100-109.
5. Backmann, J.W.
(2002), “Competitive strategy: it is O.K. to be different”, Academy of Management Executive, Vol. 16 No. 2, pp. 61-65.
Cited by
71 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献