An evaluation of the performance of a large scale collaborative procurement initiative in the social housing sector

Author:

Bowles Graeme,Morgan James

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to understand the factors relating to the implementation of a new procurement initiative that affect performance and value for money (VFM). The study is based on a four-year research project carried out on behalf of the Scottish Government to monitor and evaluate the performance and efficiency of a bulk procurement vehicle for social housing. Design/methodology/approach – The researchers had a brief to monitor and evaluate the implementation of the procurement process and its influence on cost and efficiency targets. The study employed a mixed method approach with annual rounds of qualitative and quantitative data collection from project stakeholders including the contractors, consultants, clients and sponsor. Confidential semi-structured interviews were conducted on conclusion of the project to gauge views on how well the procurement process worked from the various perspectives and to reflect on the influence of the process on VFM. Findings – The procurement programme failed to achieve the capital cost and efficiency savings targets quantified at the outset and on this measure alone VFM was not demonstrated, although there were a number of reported benefits. A major factor was the extent of process and behavioural change required from the project team and, although a procurement consultant was engaged to facilitate this, the theoretical benefits of “best practice” were not realized. The picture was further complicated by rapidly changing economic conditions experienced, and debate about the robustness of original cost savings targets. Research limitations/implications – The findings and conclusions are of relevance and interest to clients and construction organisations undergoing change through adopting novel procurement processes. Originality/value – The empirical nature of the study provides a comprehensive evidence base for the performance of a collaborative procurement programme and an understanding of the potential difficulties in attaining the theoretical benefits of procurement innovation.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

General Business, Management and Accounting,Building and Construction,Architecture,Civil and Structural Engineering

Reference40 articles.

1. Association of Consultant Architects (2010), “10 years of partnering contracts PPC2000/ TPC2005”, Kent, 2006.

2. Atkins (2011), “Rail value for money study: phase 2b package 9 – achieving value for money from improving the management and delivery of innovation in the GB rail industry”, final report.

3. Audit Commission (2009), Use of Resources Framework: Overall Approach and Key Lines of Enquiry .

4. Broome, J. and Perry, J. (2002), “How practitioners set share fractions in target cost contracts”, International Journal of Project Management , Vol. 20 No. 1, pp. 59-66.

5. CABE (2006), The Value Handbook: Getting the Most from your Buildings and Spaces , Commisision for Architecture and the Built, London.

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Public procurement policies of Nigeria and Ghana: an analysis of the administrative challenges in achieving value for money;Journal of Public Procurement;2024-02-28

2. Digitally-Enabled Design Management;Handbook of Research on Driving Transformational Change in the Digital Built Environment;2021

3. Implementing a new procurement strategy: the case of social housing associations;International Journal of Managing Projects in Business;2019-07-26

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3