Author:
Choi Jinwook,Suh Yongmoo,Jung Namchul
Abstract
PurposeThe purpose of this study is to investigate the effectiveness of qualitative information extracted from firm’s annual report in predicting corporate credit rating. Qualitative information represented by published reports or management interview has been known as an important source in addition to quantitative information represented by financial values in assigning corporate credit rating in practice. Nevertheless, prior studies have room for further research in that they rarely employed qualitative information in developing prediction model of corporate credit rating.Design/methodology/approachThis study adopted three document vectorization methods, Bag-Of-Words (BOW), Word to Vector (Word2Vec) and Document to Vector (Doc2Vec), to transform an unstructured textual data into a numeric vector, so that Machine Learning (ML) algorithms accept it as an input. For the experiments, we used the corpus of Management’s Discussion and Analysis (MD&A) section in 10-K financial reports as well as financial variables and corporate credit rating data.FindingsExperimental results from a series of multi-class classification experiments show the predictive models trained by both financial variables and vectors extracted from MD&A data outperform the benchmark models trained only by traditional financial variables.Originality/valueThis study proposed a new approach for corporate credit rating prediction by using qualitative information extracted from MD&A documents as an input to ML-based prediction models. Also, this research adopted and compared three textual vectorization methods in the domain of corporate credit rating prediction and showed that BOW mostly outperformed Word2Vec and Doc2Vec.
Subject
Library and Information Sciences,Information Systems
Reference37 articles.
1. MD&A quality as measured by the SEC and analysts' earnings forecasts;Contemporary Accounting Research,1999
2. The impact of narrative disclosure readability on bond ratings and the cost of debt;Review of Accounting Studies,2017
3. Soft information in loan agreements;Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance,2018
4. Bozanic, Z. and Kraft, P. (2014), “Qualitative disclosure and credit analysts' soft rating adjustments”, working paper, Fisher College of Business, Ohio State University, Ohio, 1 October.
5. Large‐sample evidence on firms’ year‐over‐year MD&A modifications;Journal of Accounting Research,2011
Cited by
7 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献