The management discourse: collective or strategic performance drive?

Author:

Verhoef Grietjie

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to engage with the discourse on the assumed existence of an distinct “African management” model. It critically deconstructs the concepts and submits an alternative strategy to address the need to understand what is happening in management of business in Africa. Design/methodology/approach Qualitative critical text analysis is used to understand the discourse on the nature of “African management” from the extant literature. The identity theory informs the understanding of the references to “African” as fundamental to identify a distinct management model. This analysis is supplemented by empirical case study research into successful African business. Findings Scholars failed to conceptualise what is “African”, and subsequently also what constitutes “African management”. This conceptual void undermines the critical reconstruction of a single African management model. Empirical research into actual management practices emerge as fundamental to systematic progress in this discourse. This research points to diverse management traditions converging into pragmatic practices. Research limitations/implications Only a limited number of case studies were conducted into management history in Africa. This paper argues for an extended research programme, but this is future work. Practical implications It suggests a research strategy for scholars in African business studies, business history and management history to collaborate towards making a solid contribution to the economic development of our continent. Social implications This research has the potential of forging collaboration in business among all of the people in Africa. Originality/value A critical text analysis is used to expose the conceptual lacunae that undermines progress in the discourse. This paper contributes to the literature on “African management” by systematically deconstructing the concept of “African identity” as a prerequisite to the management discourse. By signalling ethnic nostalgia, the critical reconceptualisation of Africanness offers an intellectually creative strategy out of the stalled discourse.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

History and Philosophy of Science,General Business, Management and Accounting

Reference129 articles.

1. Prospects and challenges in managing Africa’s future: an introduction;Africa Journal of Management,2017

2. Southern voices in management and organization knowledge;Organization,2012

3. Amaeshi, K. (2013a), “Africapitalism: unleasing the power of emotions for Africa’s development? African arguments of the Royal African Society”, available at: http://africanarguments.org/2013/10/02/africapitalism-unleasing-the-power-of-emotions-for-africas-development-by-kenneth-amaeshi (accessed 3 November 2019).

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. How do entrepreneurs succeed in challenging economic environments in Africa? Case study evidence from Ghana;Africa Journal of Management;2024-04-02

2. MEASURING ORGANIZATIONAL LEADERSHIP IN AFRICA;International Journal of Business & Economics (IJBE);2023-06-13

3. Who Do You Trust? Trust and Insurance Through Africa’s Past and Future;Asia-Pacific Journal of Risk and Insurance;2022-11-07

4. The Evolution of Management Thought: reflections on narrative structure;Journal of Management History;2022-09-13

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3