Author:
Dhanani Jenish,Mehta Rupa,Rana Dipti P.
Abstract
Purpose
In the Indian judicial system, the court considers interpretations of similar previous judgments for the present case. An essential requirement of legal practitioners is to determine the most relevant judgments from an enormous amount of judgments for preparing supportive, beneficial and favorable arguments against the opponent. It urges a strong demand to develop a Legal Document Recommendation System (LDRS) to automate the process. In existing works, traditionally preprocessed judgment corpus is processed by Doc2Vec to learn semantically rich judgment embedding space (i.e. vector space). Here, vectors of semantically relevant judgments are in close proximity, as Doc2Vec can effectively capture semantic meanings. The enormous amount of judgments produces a huge noisy corpus and vocabulary which possesses a significant challenge: traditional preprocessing cannot fully eliminate noisy data from the corpus and due to this, the Doc2Vec demands huge memory and time to learn the judgment embedding. It also adversely affects the recommendation performance in terms of correctness. This paper aims to develop an effective and efficient LDRS to support civilians and the legal fraternity.
Design/methodology/approach
To overcome previously mentioned challenges, this research proposes the LDRS that uses the proposed Generalized English and Indian Legal Dictionary (GEILD) which keeps the corpus of relevant dictionary words only and discards noisy elements. Accordingly, the proposed LDRS significantly reduces the corpus size, which can potentially improve the space and time efficiency of Doc2Vec.
Findings
The experimental results confirm that the proposed LDRS with GEILD yield superior performance in terms of accuracy, F1-Score, MCC-Score, with significant improvement in the space and time efficiency.
Originality/value
The proposed LDRS uses the customized domain-specific preprocessing and novel legal dictionary (i.e. GEILD) to precisely recommend the relevant judgments. The proposed LDRS can be incorporated with online legal search repositories/engines to enrich their functionality.
Subject
Computer Networks and Communications,Information Systems
Reference26 articles.
1. Case vectors: spatial representations of the law using document embeddings;Law as Data,2019
2. Latent dirichlet allocation;Journal of Machine Learning Research,2003
3. Data-centric and logic-based models for automated legal problem solving;Artificial Intelligence and Law,2017
4. Deep learning in law: early adaptation and legal word embeddings trained on large corpora;Artificial Intelligence and Law,2019
5. Ten quick tips for machine learning in computational biology;BioData Mining,2017
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Analysis on word embedding and classifier models in legal analytics;AIP Conference Proceedings;2024
2. A large scale benchmark for session-based recommendations on the legal domain;Artificial Intelligence and Law;2023-10-25
3. Physical layer security for IoT over Nakagami-m and mixed Rayleigh–Nakagami-m fading channels;Wireless Networks;2023-06-18
4. Data and Information Fusion Oriented Outline Driven Framework for Clause Extraction from Electronic Insurance Contracts;2021 IEEE 23rd Int Conf on High Performance Computing & Communications; 7th Int Conf on Data Science & Systems; 19th Int Conf on Smart City; 7th Int Conf on Dependability in Sensor, Cloud & Big Data Systems & Application (HPCC/DSS/SmartCity/DependSys);2021-12