Human‐computer interaction: the missing piece of the records management puzzle?

Author:

Bailey Steve,Vidyarthi Jay

Abstract

PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to question why records management is not currently able to fully meet the needs of its users and to explore the potential role of human‐computer interaction (HCI) in helping it to address this weakness.Design/methodology/approachThe paper has been jointly written by two authors: one a records manager; the other an experienced HCI practitioner. It draws on the experience of the records professional to identify some of the challenges facing records management today, particularly the problems it faces trying to meet the (differing?) needs of both the organization as a whole and of individual users. The HCI practitioner then explores how the application of HCI principles to the design of recordkeeping systems may offer a fresh perspective in meeting these twin demands.FindingsRecords management is heavily reliant on the participation of individual and collective users to achieve its aims, and yet the understanding of their requirements is often basic and simplistic. In part this is due to a concentration on the needs of “the organization” as a whole and of the traditional focus records management has had on standardisation. The authors argue that whilst this organizational perspective remains important, it cannot be addressed at the expense of providing genuine benefits to the individual user. The field of HCI offers a proven, robust and sophisticated way of identifying and meeting the needs of users in ways which could enable records management to meet the needs of both its “masters”.Practical implicationsThe application of HCI principles to the design of recordkeeping systems could fundamentally alter the way in which we view the implementation of record management technologies. It also raises questions about the limitations of striving to adopt a purely “standards based” approach to records management which runs counter to much of the prevailing wisdom regarding the perceived objectives of records management.Originality/valueThis paper marks the first exploration of the benefits that might be achieved by applying the field of HCI to records management. As such it represents the first important step towards creating a new inter‐disciplinary approach to achieving records management systems that fully meet the needs of their users.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Library and Information Sciences,Management Information Systems

Reference21 articles.

1. Baecker, R.M., Grudin, J., Buxton, W.A.S. and Greenberg, S. (1995), A Historical and Intellectual Perspective, Human‐Computer Interaction: Toward the Year 2000, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, San Francisco, CA.

2. Bailey, S. (2008), “Has EDRMS been a success? The case for the prosecution”, available at: http://docs.google.com/Doc?docid=0Ab4O0cPtdqSfZGM1MnFqc21fMWNobjc3emR3&hl=en (accessed 28 June 2010).

3. Bailey, S. (2009), “Forget electronic records management, its automated records management that we desperately need”, Records Management Journal, Vol. 19 No. 2, pp. 91‐7.

4. Booth, P.A. (1990), “An explanatory framework for errors”, Interacting with Computers, 10‐11 December.

5. Cooper, A. (2007), About Face 3: The Essentials of User Interface Design, Wiley, New York, NY.

Cited by 11 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Reevaluating the mission of control in records management: tools for a staff-centered approach;Records Management Journal;2022-11-09

2. Empowering professional and ethical balance in digital record management;Organizational Cybersecurity Journal: Practice, Process and People;2021-09-14

3. Chapter 9: Archival Records and Training in the Age of Big Data;Re-Envisioning the MLS: Perspectives on the Future of Library and Information Science Education;2018-03-27

4. The missing link in information and records management: personal knowledge registration;Records Management Journal;2018-03-19

5. Functional classification;Records Management Journal;2015-07-20

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3