Functional classification of records and organisational structure

Author:

Henttonen Pekka,Kettunen Kimmo

Abstract

PurposeThis paper seeks to examine how an electronic records management system has been used in a Finnish government agency. In particular, it aims to study the relationship between functional classification scheme and the way users in different organisational units and at different organisational levels have employed the system. The goal is to examine whether electronic records management systems were easier to use if the system “knew” what functional classes the user (or other employees in the user's organisational unit) typically need in their work.Design/methodology/approachThe study is based on two sources. The first source is metadata in records that were captured in the electronic records management system of the agency. It reflects actual behaviour of users when they interact with the system and classification of records. The second source is distribution of functions to organisational units in the light of policy documents and a survey made in the organisation. The study compares the two sources to see how the users have employed the electronic records management system in their work and how this relates to organisational structure and supposed usage of the system.FindingsIn general, individual employees employ only a small part of the classification. However, this does not apply at a higher level in the organisational hierarchy: the higher the person's position in the hierarchy, the more classes he/she is likely to use in the work. Regardless of the position, the classes are generally those identified as belonging to the employee's unit.Research limitations/implicationsThe study is based on one agency with a functional organisational structure. The findings may not apply to organisations where job descriptions are fluid. They should also be tested in more complex organisational settings. One could develop new methods of automated classification which combine analysis of document content with contextual reasoning about the likely functional classes.Practical implicationsAccess to electronic records management systems could be facilitated by creating in systems user/unit profiles defining what functional classes the user is most likely to need in their work. It would also be useful if systems simply remembered what functional classes the user has needed in the past.Originality/valueThe study offers insight into how an electronic records management system is used in an organisation. This is valuable for companies developing records management software and persons trying to gain a deeper understanding of records management in organisations.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Library and Information Sciences,Management Information Systems

Reference44 articles.

1. Archives New Zealand (2005), “Electronic record‐keeping systems standard”, June. Archives New Zealand, available at: http://continuum.archives.govt.nz/files/file/standards/s5.pdf (accessed 30 May 2010).

2. Arkistolaitos (2005a), “SÄHKE‐määritykset. Osa I. Abstrakti mallintaminen” [SÄHKE specification. Part I. Abstract model], available at: www.arkisto.fi//uploads/Arkistolaitos/Teht%C3%A4v%C3%A4t%20ja%20toiminta/Hankkeet/SAHA/SAHKE‐abstrakti‐V2‐koko.pdf (accessed 4 June 2010).

3. Arkistolaitos (2005b), “SÄHKE‐määritykset. Osa II. Toiminnallinen mallintaminen” [SÄHKE specification. Part II. Functional model], available at: www.arkisto.fi//uploads/Arkistolaitos/Teht%C3%A4v%C3%A4t%20ja%20toiminta/Hankkeet/SAHA/SAHKE‐Toiminnallinen‐mallintaminen‐V2‐koko.pdf (accessed 4 June 2010).

4. Arkistolaitos (2005c) “SÄHKE‐määritykset. Osa III. Tekninen mallintaminen” [SÄHKE specification. Part III. Technical model], available at: www.arkisto.fi//uploads/Arkistolaitos/Teht%C3%A4v%C3%A4t%20ja%20toiminta/Hankkeet/SAHA/SAHKE‐Tekninen‐V2‐koko.pdf (accessed 4 June 2010).

5. Arkistolaitos (2008), “SÄHKE2. Sähköisten asiakirjallisten tietojen käsittely, hallinta ja säilyttäminen” [SÄHKE2 Management, handling and preservation of electronic records], available at: www.arkisto.fi//uploads/normit/valtionhallinto/maarayksetjaohjeet/normiteksti_suomi.pdf (accessed 4 June 2010).

Cited by 13 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3