Abstract
PurposeThis paper seeks to examine the changes in the methods of graduate recruitment and selection that have been used by UK‐based organisations and to establish the reasons for the main changes and developments in the process of attracting and recruiting graduates.Design/methodology/approachData were collected through the use of a structured questionnaire. Questionnaires were sent to 700 UK‐based employers selected from the Prospects Directory, the Graduate Employment and Training (GET) Directory and the Times Top 100 Graduate Recruiters. The response rate was just over 50 per cent and the data were analysed by using the statistical analysis software SPSS. The variables used were organisation size, recruitment methods, selection methods, cost, skills and reasons for the use of methods.FindingsThe analysis has shown that all employers, regardless of organisation size or activity type, tend to use more sophisticated, objective and cost‐effective methods of recruitment and selection than before. The process of graduate recruitment and selection in the UK has become more person‐related than job‐oriented because many employers are more interested in the attitudes, personality and transferable skills of applicants than the type or level of qualification acquired. Although some of the usual methods such as interviewing remain popular, there is a greater variety of ways by which graduates are attracted to and selected for their first jobs.Originality/valueThe findings of this study are expected to be useful for employers considering the introduction of new graduate recruitment programmes and for those wishing to improve their existing ones as well as for institutions of higher education to reconsider the type of knowledge and skills they provide in order to prepare their students for the real world of work.
Subject
Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management,Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
Reference38 articles.
1. Anderson, N. and Witvliet, C. (2008), “Fairness reactions to personnel selection methods: an international comparison between The Netherlands, the United States, France, Spain, Portugal, and Singapore”, International Journal of Selection and Assessment, Vol. 16 No. 1, pp. 1‐13.
2. Association of Graduate Recruiters (1995), Skills for Graduates in the 21st Century, Association of Graduate Recruiters, Cambridge.
3. Association of Graduate Recruiters (1999), The AGR Salaries and Vacancies Survey, Summer, Association of Graduate Recruiters, London.
4. Barclay, J.M. (1999), “Employee selection: a question of structure”, Personnel Review, Vol. 28 No. 1/2, pp. 134‐51.
5. Beardwell, I., Holden, L. and Claydon, T. (2004), Human Resource Management, 4th ed., Prentice Hall, Harlow.
Cited by
68 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献