Author:
de Janasz Suzanne C.,Behson Scott J.
Abstract
PurposeThe purpose of this study is to examine how individuals cognitively process work‐family conflict (WFC), specifically whether differences in tolerance for uncertainty and cognitive complexity influence individuals' affective response to WFC.Design/methodology/approachUsing a sample of 157 employees who completed a survey on work‐family issues, the hypotheses were tested using correlation and regression analyses.FindingsThe results suggest that cognitive differences may moderate the negative impacts of WFC. It was found that while WFC (i.e. work interference with family) lowers job satisfaction, this effect is less strong for those high in tolerance for uncertainty. The same was true for the ameliorating effect of cognitive complexity and tolerance for uncertainty on the link between WFC and (i.e. family interference with work) organizational commitment.Research limitations/implicationsBecause of its cross‐sectional design, the causality of the findings cannot be confirmed. Further, while the sample contained both parents and non‐parents, and men and women, due to power concerns, our analyses did not account for these demographic differences. Future research should be designed to correct for these issues.Practical implicationsOrganizations may need to rethink their programs and policies aimed at assisting employees in balancing work and family. Simple options (e.g. time off) may appeal to all employees; however others (e.g. job sharing and flextime) require complicated arrangements or behavior changes and may only appeal to or be utilized successfully by employees with high tolerance for uncertainty and cognitive complexity.Originality/valueWithin work‐family research, few studies look at how individual cognitive processes influence whether and how potentially conflictual situations are perceived and their impact on individual outcomes such as satisfaction and commitment. The research investigates two such cognitive differences and demonstrates the role that tolerance for uncertainty and cognitive complexity may play in reducing the negative impact of work‐family conflict.
Subject
Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management,Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
Reference81 articles.
1. Adams, G.A., King, L.A. and King, D.W. (1996), “Relationships of job and family involvement, family social support, and work‐family conflict with job and life satisfaction”, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 76, pp. 60‐74.
2. Allen, T.D. (2001), “Family‐supportive work environments: the role of organizational perceptions”, Journal of Vocational Behavior, Vol. 58, pp. 414‐35.
3. Allen, T.D., Herst, D.E., Bruck, C.S. and Sutton, M. (2000), “Consequences associated with work‐to‐family conflict: a review and agenda for further research”, Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, Vol. 5, pp. 278‐308.
4. Barnes, J.H. Jr (1984), “Cognitive biases and their impact on strategic planning”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 5 No. 2, pp. 129‐37.
5. Batt, R. and Valcour, P.M. (2003), “Human resources practices as predictors of work‐family outcomes and employee turnover”, Industrial Relations, Vol. 42, pp. 189‐220.
Cited by
11 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献