Author:
Carrets Fernanda Dachi,Ribeiro Felipe Garcia,Teixeira Gibran da Silva
Abstract
Purpose
The purpose of this paper is to investigate whether isolated illiteracy generates a barrier to knowledge about the Brazilian Federal Government’s Single Registry for social programs.
Design/methodology/approach
Based on information contained in the Brazilian National Household Sample Survey (Pesquisa Nacional por Amostra de Domicilios – PNAD) 2014, the propensity score matching method was combined with the algorithm proposed by Imbens (2015). The analyzed sample consists of two groups of illiterate individuals: isolated illiterates (IILs) (treatment group), which consists of only illiterate individuals who live with other illiterates; and proximate illiterates (PILs) (control group), which consists of illiterates who live with someone who is literate in the household.
Findings
Evidence indicates that IIL individuals are, on average, less likely to know about the single registry than PIL people.
Research limitations/implications
The main limitation relates to the database since the only information available in the PNAD on the access to the single registry is for the year 2014.
Practical implications
The evidence found in the study reinforces the need to invest in the fight against illiteracy in Brazil.
Social implications
Results show that a portion of the possible beneficiaries of social programs are still “invisible” to the government’s social protection networks, and this highlights the existence of possible errors of exclusion.
Originality/value
The paper compares two groups of illiterate people, a group that lives in an isolated illiteracy situation and the other that does not. It also assesses the effect of literacy externalities on the access to the Brazilian Single Registry.
Subject
General Social Sciences,Economics and Econometrics
Reference39 articles.
1. A new and easy-to-use measure of literacy, its axiomatic properties and an application;Social Choice and Welfare,2009
2. On measuring literacy;The Economic Journal,1998
3. Is literacy shared within households? Theory and evidence for Bangladesh;Labour Economics,2001
4. The role of maternal literacy in reducing the risk of child malnutrition in India,2009
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献