Author:
Anatolievna Molodchik Mariya,Anatolievna Shakina Elena,Barajas Angel
Abstract
Purpose
– The purpose of this paper is to explore the plausibility of six elements of IC and justify the measurement ability of a set of indicators based on publicly available data for each of the proposed element in order to provide tools to managers for their decision-making process in knowledge management (KM).
Design/methodology/approach
– Core company's intangibles are combined into six intellectual capital (IC) elements that appear after the division of each of the traditional components (human, structural and relational capital (RC)). The human capital includes management and human resources capabilities (HRC). Structural capital is divided into innovation and internal process capabilities (IPC). RC contains networking capabilities and customer loyalty. In drawing on the relevant literature each element is described through a set of indicators collected from publicly available data. The validity of proposed IC model is justified through structural equation modeling. Each element is tested on a sample of more than 1,650 listed European companies over the period of 2004-2011.
Findings
– The study gives empirical support of three component IC structure and its decomposition into second level. The findings reveal that implementation of KM plays a significant role for HRC as well as for IPC.
Research limitations/implications
– The analysis was conducted for a particular sample that may restrict the conclusions.
Practical implications
– The proposed measurements for intangibles can be applied by any company for benchmarking and comparative analysis in KM.
Originality/value
– The study provides empirical justification of metrics for intangibles allowing a better route in an economy driven by knowledge.
Subject
General Business, Management and Accounting,Education
Reference58 articles.
1. Adams, M.
and
Oleksak, M.
(2010), Intangible Capital: Putting Knowledge to Work in the 21st-Century Organization, Praeger, Santa Barbara/Denver/Oxford.
2. Andriessen, D.
(2004), Making Sense of Intellectual Capital: Designing a Method for the Valuation of Intangibles, Elsiver Butterworth Heinemann, Oxford.
3. Arnott, D.C.
and
Bridgewater, S.
(2002), “Internet, interaction and implication for marketing”, Marketing Intelligence & Planning, Vol. 20 No. 2, pp. 86-95.
4. Balakrishnan, S.
and
Fox, I.
(1993), “Asset specificity: firm heterogeneity and capital structure”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 14 No. 1, pp. 3-16.
5. Bontis, N.
(2001), “Assessing knowledge assets: a review of the models used to measure intellectual capital”, International Journal of Management Reviews, Vol. 3 No. 1, pp. 41-60.
Cited by
48 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献