Situated algorithms: a sociotechnical systemic approach to bias

Author:

Draude Claude,Klumbyte GodaORCID,Lücking Phillip,Treusch Pat

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to propose that in order to tackle the question of bias in algorithms, a systemic, sociotechnical and holistic perspective is needed. With reference to the term “algorithmic culture,” the interconnectedness and mutual shaping of society and technology are postulated. A sociotechnical approach requires translational work between and across disciplines. This conceptual paper undertakes such translational work. It exemplifies how gender and diversity studies, by bringing in expertise on addressing bias and structural inequalities, provide a crucial source for analyzing and mitigating bias in algorithmic systems. Design/methodology/approach After introducing the sociotechnical context, an overview is provided regarding the contemporary discourse around bias in algorithms, debates around algorithmic culture, knowledge production and bias identification as well as common solutions. The key concepts of gender studies (situated knowledges and strong objectivity) and concrete examples of gender bias then serve as a backdrop for revisiting contemporary debates. Findings The key concepts reframe the discourse on bias and concepts such as algorithmic fairness and transparency by contextualizing and situating them. The paper includes specific suggestions for researchers and practitioners on how to account for social inequalities in the design of algorithmic systems. Originality/value A systemic, gender-informed approach for addressing the issue is provided, and a concrete, applicable methodology toward a situated understanding of algorithmic bias is laid out, providing an important contribution for an urgent multidisciplinary dialogue.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Library and Information Sciences,Computer Science Applications,Information Systems

Reference86 articles.

1. ACM US Public Policy Council (2017), “Statement on algorithmic transparency and accountability”, ACM, Washington, DC, December 1, available at: www.acm.org/binaries/content/assets/public-policy/2017_usacm_statement_algorithms.pdf (accessed October 26, 2018).

2. Agre, P.E. (1997), “Toward a critical technical practice: lessons learned in trying to reform AI”, in Bowker, G., Gasser, L., Star, L. and Turner, B. (Eds), Bridging the Great Divide: Social Science, Technical Systems, and Cooperative Work, Erlbaum, New York, NY, pp. 131-158.

3. Akrich, M. (1992), “The de-scription of technical objects”, in Bijker, W.E. and Law, J. (Eds), Shaping Technology/Building Society. Studies in Sociotechnical Change, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 205-224.

4. A brief introduction to decolonial computing;XRDS: Crossroads, The ACM Magazine for Students,2016

5. Towards algorithmic experience: initial efforts for social media contexts,2018

Cited by 30 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3