Author:
Joslin Robert,Müller Ralf
Abstract
Purpose
– The purpose of this paper is to qualitatively validate the constructs of a theoretically derived research model while gaining insights to steer the direction of a greater study on methodologies, their elements, and their impact on project success. In doing so, to investigate whether different project environments, notably project governance, impacts the relationship between methodologies and project success.
Design/methodology/approach
– A deductive approach was applied to validate a theoretically derived research model. In total, 19 interviews across 11 industrial sectors and four countries were used to collect data. Pattern-matching techniques were utilized in the analysis to deductively validate the research model.
Findings
– There is a positive relationship between project methodology elements and the characteristics of project success; however, environmental factors, notably project governance, influence the use and effectiveness of a project methodology and its elements with a resulting impact on the characteristics of project success.
Research limitations/implications
– Project governance plays a major role in the moderating effect of a project methodology’s effectiveness. Contingency theory is applicable to a project’s methodology’s selection and its customization according to the project environment.
Practical implications
– Understand the impact of project methodologies and their elements on the characteristics of project success while being moderated by the project environment, for example, the risk of suboptimal project performance due to the effectiveness of methodology elements being negatively impacted by the project environment.
Originality/value
– The impact of a project methodology (collection of heterogeneous-related elements) on the characteristics of project success is identified while being moderated by the project environment, notably project governance.
Subject
Strategy and Management,Business and International Management
Reference77 articles.
1. Alvesson, M.
(2009), “(Post-) positivism, social constructionism, critical realism: three reference points in the philosophy of science”, in
Alvesson, M.
and
Sköldberg, K.
(Eds),
Reflexive Methodology: New Vistas for Qualitative Research
, 2nd ed., SAGE Publications Ltd, London, pp. 15-51.
2. Anderson, D.K.
and
Merna, T.
(2003), “Project management strategy – project management represented as a process based set of management domains and the consequences for project management strategy”,
International Journal of Project Management
, Vol. 21 No. 6, pp. 387-393.
3. Atkinson, R.
(1999), “Project management: cost, time and quality, two best guesses and a phenomenon, it’s time to accept other success criteria”,
International Journal of Project Management
, Vol. 17 No. 6, pp. 337-342.
4. Belassi, W.
and
Tukel, O.I.
(1996), “A new framework for determining critical success/failure factors in projects”,
International Journal of Project Management
, Vol. 14 No. 3, pp. 141-151.
5. Belout, A.
(1998), “Effects of human resource management on project effectiveness and success: toward a new conceptual framework”,
International Journal of Project Management
, Vol. 16 No. 1, pp. 21-26.
Cited by
74 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献