Roles of scholars in environmental community conflict resolution

Author:

Yang Lihua,Lan G. Zhiyong,He Shuang

Abstract

Purpose – This study aims to investigate scholars’ roles in resolving environmental community conflict, as environmental community conflict is becoming an increasingly serious problem in contemporary China, and it explored the underlying factors and mechanisms that influence successful conflict resolution. Design/methodology/approach – Based on a combination of three types of sources – interviews, participant observation and existing literature, the study compared and contrasted 35 cases through a two-stage study project with 25 environmental community conflict cases in the first stage and ten non-environmental cases in the second. Findings – Results indicate that scholars serve seven roles in community conflict resolution: identification persons for potential sources of community conflict and supporters for the people who evaluate conflict problems before attempting to solve them; advisers for conflict protagonists; leaders of many knowledge-related activities; organizers of entrepreneurial activities for other community members; information brokers between community members and other stakeholders; representatives of the government, firms, community members and other stakeholders; and self-interested participants. While scholars’ participation is important for resolving community conflict, their actions are often not effective. Successful community conflict resolution involving scholars must satisfy eight underlying factors: local scholars’ sustained participation; high capacity; improvement on the organizational level of community members; emphasis on high efficiency knowledge and information transmission; effective finding and use of the community’s social capital; continual optimization on their action strategies; obtainability of some benefits; and non-local scholars’ sustained external support through social capital. The more closely these rules are followed, the more successful scholars’ participation in community conflict resolution will be. Originality/value – The findings have practical implications for improving the effectiveness of scholars’ participation in community conflict resolution in contemporary China and even in other countries.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Management of Technology and Innovation,Strategy and Management,Communication

Reference97 articles.

1. Alberts, J.K. , Heisterkamp, B.L. and McPhee, R.M. (2005), “Disputant perceptions of and satisfaction with a community mediation program”, The International Journal of Conflict Management , Vol. 16 No. 3, pp. 218-244.

2. Army, D. (1987), The Politics of Environmental Mediation , Columbia University Press, New York, NY.

3. Avgar, A.C. (2010), “Negotiated capital: conflict, its resolution, and workplace social capital”, International Journal of Conflict Management , Vol. 21 No. 3, pp. 236-259.

4. Avruch, K. (1998), Culture and Conflict Resolution , United States Institute of Peace Press, Washington, DC.

5. Bercovitch, J. (2002), “Introduction: putting mediation in context”, in Bercovitch, J. (Ed.), Studies in International Mediation: Essays in Honor of Jeffrey Z. Rubin , Palgrave/Macmillan, New York, NY, pp. 3-24.

Cited by 6 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3