Human rights dimensions of COVID-19 responses in Bangladesh: challenges and recommendations

Author:

Mannan Sonia,Alam Jobair,Rahman Md Habibur

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to scrutinize the human rights dimensions of COVID-19 responses in Bangladesh through a viewpoint methodology in four critical areas: freedom of opinion and expression; access to information; protection of health-care workers; and marginalized populations’ access to health care. However, these responses remain non-aligned with the international human rights law obligations of Bangladesh, which undermines the human rights and dignity of its population. Based on the responses shaping and aggravating the situation, this paper concludes with some recommendations, which can be helpful for Bangladesh for better human rights responses in these areas, should a parallel situation emerge in the future. Design/methodology/approach This paper scrutinizes the human rights dimensions of COVID-19 responses in Bangladesh through a viewpoint methodology. Findings The responses of Bangladesh remain non-aligned with international human rights law obligations of Bangladesh, which undermines the human rights and dignity of its population. Originality/value This paper concludes with some recommendations, which can be helpful for Bangladesh for better human rights responses in these areas, should a parallel situation emerge in the future.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Health Policy,Public Administration,Sociology and Political Science,Social Psychology,Health (social science)

Reference58 articles.

1. Abrar, C.R. (2020), “Freedom of expression is vital during covid-19”, The Daily Star, 25 April, available at: www.thedailystar.net/opinion/news/freedom-expression-vital-during-covid-19-1896373 (accessed 8 April 2021).

2. COVID-19 health crisis and prevalence of anxiety among individuals of various age groups: a qualitative study;The Journal of Mental Health Training, Education and Practice,2020

3. Aiman, S.U. (2020), “Covid-19 and rights of the healthcare workers”, The Daily Star, 30 June, available at: www.thedailystar.net/law-our-rights/news/covid-19-and-rights-the-healthcare-workers-1922485 (accessed 12 April 2021).

4. Reflections on the right to palliative care in Bangladesh: legal regime revisited;Bangladesh Journal of Bioethics,2013

5. American Association for the International Commission of Jurists (1985), “Siracusa principles on the limitation and derogation provisions in the international covenant on civil and political rights”, available at: www.icj.org/wp-content/uploads/1984/07/Siracusa-principles-ICCPR-legal-submission-1985-eng.pdf (accessed 8 April 2021).

Cited by 5 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3