Abstract
PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to examine how the monetary value of a retail transaction (transaction size) impacts consumers' preferences for cash, debit and credit card payment modes.Design/methodology/approachDrawing on the analytical and empirical literature on retail payment mode choice and the related literature on differences in payment mode attributes, the author develops and tests a hypothesis that at retail point of purchase, cash, debit and credit card will be preferred payment modes for low‐, medium‐ and high‐value transactions, respectively. The hypothesis is tested in an experimental survey in which a sample of 477 respondents indicate which payment mode they would most likely use for each of ten products that vary systematically in list prices.FindingsThe results offer broad support for the hypothesis. They also show that preferences for debit and credit card payment modes are similar at low transaction values (both are less preferred), whilst those for debit and cash payment are similar at large transaction values (again, both are less preferred). This suggests that electronic payment modes are collectively a substitute for cash for low transaction values, whilst credit cards are a substitute for cash and debit cards for high transaction values.Research limitations/implicationsA key implication of the results is that it may be possible to persuade consumers in the study context to use electronic payments for small‐value transactions by invoking and making salient, convenience considerations that are purported to drive preferences for cash payment for such purchases.Originality/valueThe results also offer an alternative explanation for the continuing dominance of cash transactions in modern economies, and outlines implications for promoting consumer use of electronic payment modes at retail point of purchase.
Subject
Business and International Management,Marketing
Reference38 articles.
1. Abdul‐Muhmin, A.G. (1998), “Demographic differences in usage and attitudes toward the Saudi Arabian EFTPoS system”, International Journal of Bank Marketing, Vol. 16 No. 3, pp. 117‐28.
2. Abdul‐Muhmin, A.G. and Umar, Y.A. (2007), “Credit card ownership and usage behavior in Saudi Arabia”, Journal of Financial Services Marketing, Vol. 12 No. 3, pp. 219‐34.
3. Amromin, G., Jankowski, C. and Porter, R.D. (2007), “Transforming payment choices by doubling fees on the Illinois Tollway”, Economic Perspectives, Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago, pp. 22‐47 (second Quarter).
4. Bank for International Settlements (2003), “Payment systems in Saudi Arabia”, Report of the Committee on Payment Systems, Bank for International Settlements, Basel.
5. Barker, T. and Sekerkaya, A. (1992), “Globalization of credit card usage”, International Journal of Bank Marketing, Vol. 10 No. 6, pp. 27‐31.
Cited by
8 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Prediction of Payment Modes for Online Taxi Users Using Machine Learning;2023 3rd International Conference on Electronic and Electrical Engineering and Intelligent System (ICE3IS);2023-08-09
2. Paradigm shifts in Indian retail - trends and prospects;International Journal of Indian Culture and Business Management;2019
3. Die Gestaltungsfaktoren des Einkaufserlebnisses;Die Treiber der Customer Experience;2019
4. Factors affecting store image and the choice of hypermarkets in Oman;International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management;2017-06-12
5. Telecom market liberalization and service performance outcomes of an incumbent monopoly;International Business Review;2017-04