Patient‐centred quality improvement audit

Author:

Berman Brown Reva,Bell Louise

Abstract

PurposeThis article aims to describe the research process, and the development of the instrument now employed in auditing patients' perceptions of quality improvement in a community health care trust in a coastal town in Essex, England.Design/methodology/approachThe new instrument is currently being implemented and the findings thus far are described.FindingsThe instrument has measured health outcomes in terms of quality improvement from the users' perspective, and has also highlighted gaps between what the service offers in terms of quality and users' perceptions of what is delivered. The study demonstrates the importance of the professional role in quality improvement.Originality/valuePatient‐centred quality improvement audit should be undertaken regularly so that both non‐clinical managers and health care professionals can establish whether or not they are providing services that are patient‐friendly and effective from the user's viewpoint. In the course of their work, professionals and managers discuss patients and speak on their behalf in various forums, and knowing what patients actually expect and perceive before speaking on their behalf may be of great benefit in such instances.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Health Policy,General Business, Management and Accounting

Reference28 articles.

1. Babakus, E. and Mangold, W. (1992), “Adapting the SERVQUAL scale to hospital services: an empirical investigation”, Health Services Research, Vol. 26 No. 6, pp. 765‐85.

2. Batalden, P. (2002), “Quality improvement: noun or verb?”, Quality and Safety in Health Care, Vol. 11 No. 2, p. 152.

3. Berwick, D. (1989), “Continuous improvements as an ideal in healthcare”, New England Journal of Medicine, Vol. 320, pp. 53‐6.

4. College of Health (1994), Consumer Audit Guidelines, College of Health, London.

5. Dennis, N. (1991), Ask the Patient: New Approaches to Consumer Feedback in General Practice, College of Health in conjunction with Kensington, Chelsea and Westminster FHSA, London.

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3