Can artificial intelligence, RegTech and CharityTech provide effective solutions for anti-money laundering and counter-terror financing initiatives in charitable fundraising

Author:

Singh Charanjit,Lin Wangwei

Abstract

Purpose Artificial intelligence has had a major impact on organisations from Banking through to Law Firms. The rate at which technology has developed in terms of tasks that are complex, technical and time-consuming has been astounding. The purpose of this paper is to explore the solutions that AI, RegTech and CharityTech provide to charities in navigating the vast amount of anti-money laundering and counter-terror finance legislation in the UK; so that they comply with the requirements and mitigate the potential risk they face but also develop a more coherent and streamlined set of actions. Design/methodology/approach The subject is approached through the analysis of data, literature and, domestic and international regulation. The first part of the paper explores the current obligations and risks charities face, these are then, in the second part, set against the examination of potential technological solutions as of August 2020. Findings It is suggested that charities underestimate the importance of the nature and size of the threat posed to them, this is significant, as demonstrated, given the growing size and impact of the sector. Technological solutions are suggested to combat the issues charities face. Originality/value The study is original because it is the first to create the notion of CharityTech and to specifically explore what technological advances can assist charities in meeting the regulatory compliance challenge.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Law,General Economics, Econometrics and Finance,Public Administration

Reference55 articles.

1. AI resource centre: IBM (2020), “Mitigating human bias in AI”, available at: www.research.ibm.com/5-in-5/ai-and-bias/ (accessed 31 March 2020).

2. Shell charities and terrorist financing: a sledgehammer to crack a shell?;Trusts Law International,2017

3. Beioley, K. (2019), “Robots and AI threaten to mediate disputes better than lawyers”, Financial Times, available at: www.ft.com/content/187525d2-9e6e-11e9-9c06-a4640c9feebb (accessed 1 April 2020).

4. AI fairness 360: an extensible toolkit for detecting and mitigating algorithmic bias;IBM Journal of Research and Development,2019

5. Through the looking glass: European perspectives on non-profit vulnerability, legitimacy and regulation;Brooklyn Journal of International Law,2011

Cited by 31 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3