Entry‐level RP machines: how well can they cope with geometric complexity?

Author:

Pei Eujin,Ian Campbell R.,de Beer Deon

Abstract

PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to examine the limitations of entry‐level rapid prototyping (ELRP) machines when fabricating objects with high complexity.Design/methodology/approachThe literature review provides an overview of RP technologies, followed by a discussion on the different levels of complexity in objects. The paper continues with a discussion on the definition of ELRP, followed by a number of experiments to explore the limitations of an ELRP system when fabricating complex models, and to compare the results obtained with those from a professional RP machine using standardised build parameters and the same acrylonitrile butadiene styrene material.FindingsOf the five complex models that were produced from the Rapman machine, four of them were affected by warping; also, support structures were difficult to remove due to the interwoven build pattern. The study also found that the Rapman parts were coarsely built as opposed to the Dimension parts that were less coarse. The Rapman parts were also much lighter due to the hollow internal structure, as compared to the dimension parts that were virtually solid. From a quantitative viewpoint, parts produced from the Rapman machine showed significantly greater average errors in both absolute and percentage terms.Practical implicationsUsers should bear in mind the restrictions of ELRP machines when fabricating complex shapes. The models may be prone to warping and the support structures could be difficult to remove.Originality/valueThis paper allows developers to understand the restrictions when fabricating complex models on an ELRP machine. The findings will also enable manufacturers to develop better entry‐level systems.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering,Control and Systems Engineering

Reference32 articles.

1. Azari, A. and Nikzad, S. (2009), “The evolution of rapid prototyping in dentistry: a review”, Rapid Prototyping Journal, Vol. 15 No. 3, pp. 216‐25.

2. Bits from Bytes (2010), “Heated bed”, available at: www.bitsfrombytes.com/ora/user/index.php?topic=398.0 (accessed 1 March 2010).

3. Breslin, S. (2010), Vision: Looking at the Future of Learning, Futurelab, Bristol, January‐June, pp. 4‐6.

4. Dean, A. (2009), “Z Corporation ZPrinter 650”, available at: http://develop3d.com/reviews/z‐corporation‐zprinter‐650 (accessed 1 March 2010).

5. de Beer, D.J., Campbell, R.I., Truscott, M., Barnard, L.J., and Booysen, G.J. (2009), “Client‐centred design evolution via functional prototyping”, International Journal of Product Development, Vol. 8 No. 1, pp. 22‐41.

Cited by 21 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3