Performance evaluation and comparison of the five most used search engines in retrieving web resources

Author:

Deka Sanjib K.,Lahkar Narendra

Abstract

PurposeThe purpose of the paper is to evaluate the performance and efficiency of the five most used search engines, i.e. Google, Yahoo!, Live, Ask, and AOL, in retrieving internet resources at specific points of time using a large number of complex queries.Design/methodology/approachIn order to examine the performance of the five search engines, five sets of experiments were conducted using 50 complex queries within two different time frames. The data were evaluated using Excel and SPSS software.FindingsThe paper results highlight the fact that different web search engines, which use different technology to find and present web information, yield different first page search results. The overall analysis of the findings of different measures reveals that Google has a significantly higher rate of performance in retrieving web resources as compared with the other four search engines. Yahoo! is the second best in terms of retrieval performance. The other three search engines did not performed satisfactorily compared with Google and Yahoo!Originality/valueThe paper will provide important insight into the effectiveness of major search engines and their ability to retrieve relevant internet resources. This paper has produced key findings that are important for all web search engine users and researchers, and the web industry. The findings will also assist search companies to improve their services.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Library and Information Sciences,Computer Science Applications,Information Systems

Reference17 articles.

1. Bar‐Ilan, J. (1998), “Search engine results over time: a case study on search engine stability”, International Journal of Scientometrics, Informetrics and Bibliometrics, Vol. 2/3 No. 1, available at: www.cindoc.csic.es/cybermetrics/articles/v2i1p1.html (accessed 11 January 2006).

2. Bar‐Ilan, J. (2002), “Methods for measuring search engines performance over time”, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Vol. 53 No. 4, pp. 308‐19.

3. Bar‐Ilan, J., Levene, M. and Mat‐Hassan, M. (2006), “Methods for evaluating dynamic changes in search engine rankings: a case study”, Journal of Documentation, Vol. 62 No. 6, pp. 708‐29.

4. Chu, H. and Rosenthal, M. (1996), “Search engines for the world wide web: a comparative study and evaluation methodology”, ASIS Annual Conference Proceedings, Baltimore, MD, 19‐24 October, pp. 127‐35, available at: www.asis.org/annual‐96/ElectronicProceedings/chu.html (accessed 20 January 2007).

5. Dogpile.com (2005), “Different engines, different results”, available at: www.infospaceinc.com/onlineprod/Overlap‐DifferentEnginesDifferentResults.pdf (accessed 1 July 2007).

Cited by 20 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3