Author:
Mu Xiangming,Lu Kun,Ryu Hohyon
Abstract
PurposeThe goals of this study are: to evaluate the merits of a newly developed health information retrieval system; to investigate users' search strategies when using the new search system; and to study the relationships between users' search strategies and their prior topic knowledge.Design/methodology/approachThe paper developed a new health information retrieval system called MeshMed. A term browser and a tree browser are included in the new system in addition to the traditional search box. The term browser allows a user to search Medical Subject Heading (MeSH) terms using natural language. The tree browser presents a hierarchical tree structure of related MeSH terms. A user study with 30 participants was conducted to evaluate the benefits of MeshMed.FindingsThe paper found that MeshMed provides a user with more choices to select an appropriate searching component and form more effective search strategies. Based on the time a participant spent using different MeshMed components, the paper identified three different search styles: the traditional style, the novel style, and the balanced style, which falls in between. MeshMed was particularly helpful for users with low topic knowledge.Originality/valueA new health information retrieval system (MeshMed) was designed and developed (and is currently available at http://129.89.43.129/meshmed). This is the first study to explore users' search strategies on such a system. The study results can inform the design of future clinical‐oriented health information retrieval systems.
Subject
Library and Information Sciences,Computer Science Applications,Information Systems
Reference28 articles.
1. Bates, M.J. (1979), “Information search tactics”, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, Vol. 30, pp. 205‐14.
2. Bates, M.J. (2007), “What is browsing – really? A model drawing from behavioural science research”, Information Research, Vol. 12 No. 4, available at: http://InformationR.net/ir/12‐4/paper330.html (accessed 15 February 2010).
3. Belkin, N.J. (1980), “Anomalous states of knowledge as a basis for information retrieval”, Canadian Journal of Information Science, Vol. 5, pp. 133‐43.
4. Bhavnani, S.K. and Bates, M.J. (2002), “Separating the knowledge layers: cognitive analysis of search knowledge through hierarchical goal decompositions”, Proceedings of the ASIST Annual Meeting, Wiley InterScience, Philadelphia, PA, pp. 204‐13.
5. Carmel, E., Crawford, S. and Chen, H. (1992), “Browsing in hypertext: a cognitive study”, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Vol. 22 No. 5, pp. 865‐84.
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献