Search strategies on a new health information retrieval system

Author:

Mu Xiangming,Lu Kun,Ryu Hohyon

Abstract

PurposeThe goals of this study are: to evaluate the merits of a newly developed health information retrieval system; to investigate users' search strategies when using the new search system; and to study the relationships between users' search strategies and their prior topic knowledge.Design/methodology/approachThe paper developed a new health information retrieval system called MeshMed. A term browser and a tree browser are included in the new system in addition to the traditional search box. The term browser allows a user to search Medical Subject Heading (MeSH) terms using natural language. The tree browser presents a hierarchical tree structure of related MeSH terms. A user study with 30 participants was conducted to evaluate the benefits of MeshMed.FindingsThe paper found that MeshMed provides a user with more choices to select an appropriate searching component and form more effective search strategies. Based on the time a participant spent using different MeshMed components, the paper identified three different search styles: the traditional style, the novel style, and the balanced style, which falls in between. MeshMed was particularly helpful for users with low topic knowledge.Originality/valueA new health information retrieval system (MeshMed) was designed and developed (and is currently available at http://129.89.43.129/meshmed). This is the first study to explore users' search strategies on such a system. The study results can inform the design of future clinical‐oriented health information retrieval systems.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Library and Information Sciences,Computer Science Applications,Information Systems

Reference28 articles.

1. Bates, M.J. (1979), “Information search tactics”, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, Vol. 30, pp. 205‐14.

2. Bates, M.J. (2007), “What is browsing – really? A model drawing from behavioural science research”, Information Research, Vol. 12 No. 4, available at: http://InformationR.net/ir/12‐4/paper330.html (accessed 15 February 2010).

3. Belkin, N.J. (1980), “Anomalous states of knowledge as a basis for information retrieval”, Canadian Journal of Information Science, Vol. 5, pp. 133‐43.

4. Bhavnani, S.K. and Bates, M.J. (2002), “Separating the knowledge layers: cognitive analysis of search knowledge through hierarchical goal decompositions”, Proceedings of the ASIST Annual Meeting, Wiley InterScience, Philadelphia, PA, pp. 204‐13.

5. Carmel, E., Crawford, S. and Chen, H. (1992), “Browsing in hypertext: a cognitive study”, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Vol. 22 No. 5, pp. 865‐84.

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3