Healthcare system performance improvement

Author:

Gauld Robin,Burgers Jako,Dobrow Mark,Minhas Rubin,Wendt Claus,B. Cohen Alan,Luxford Karen

Abstract

Purpose – Evidence suggests that healthcare system performance may be improved with policy emphasis on primary care, quality improvement, and information technology. The authors therefore sought to investigate the extent to which policy makers in seven countries are emphasizing these areas. Design/methodology/approach – Policies in these three areas in seven high-income countries were compared. A comparative descriptive approach was taken in which each of the country-specialist authors supplied information on key policies and developments pertaining to primary care, quality improvement and information technology, supplemented with routine data. Findings – Each of the seven countries faces similar challenges with healthcare system performance, yet differs in emphasis on the three key policy areas; efforts in each are, at best, patchy. The authors conclude that there is substantial scope for policy makers to further emphasize primary care, quality improvement and information technology if aiming for high-performing healthcare systems. Originality/value – This is the first study to investigate policy-makers' commitment to key areas known to improve health system performance. The comparative method illustrates the different emphases that countries have placed on primary care, quality improvement and information technology development.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Health Policy,Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous)

Reference53 articles.

1. Blackmore, C. , Mecklenburg, R. and Kaplan, G. (2011), “At Virginia Mason, collaboration among providers, employers, and health plans to transform care cut costs and improved quality”, Health Affairs, Vol. 30, pp. 1680-1687.

2. Bohmer, R.M.J. (2009), Designing Care: Aligning the Nature and Management of Health Care, Harvard Business Press, Boston, MA.

3. Busse, R. and Riesberg, A. (2004), Health Care Systems in Transition: Germany, European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies, Copenhagen.

4. Central Intelligence Agency (2012), The World Factbook 2012, Central Intelligence Agency, Washington, DC, available at: www.cia.gov/cia/publications/factbook/index.html.

5. Chaudry, B. , Wang, J. , Wu, S. , Maglione, M. , Mojica, W. , Roth, E. , Morton, S. and Shekelle, P. (2006), “Systematic review: impact of health information technology on quality, efficiency, and costs of medical care”, Annals of Internal Medicine, Vol. 144, pp. 742-752.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3