Context matters: general practice and social work – the Birmingham story

Author:

Lotinga Alan

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to describe the approach adopted to building relationships between health and social care in Birmingham. Design/methodology/approach – This is a practical case study, reflecting on personal experience of being directly involved in the situations and discussions described. It supplements a 2012 paper (Lotinga and Glasby, 2012) on the creation of Birmingham’s Health and Well-being Board. Findings – Local history and context is crucial in shaping the nature of local joint working initiatives – understanding where local services have come from and why they have made the choices they have is a crucial pre-requisite for understanding current and future opportunities. Research limitations/implications – This paper aims to place joint working between general practice and social work in a broader organisational, financial and policy setting – and placing local developments in this wider context is crucial for understanding barriers and opportunities locally. Originality/value – In the absence of a detailed evidence base, front-line practice is often far ahead of the current research evidence. This means that local case studies like this are crucial in terms of sharing learning with other areas of the country, with policy makers and with researchers. While many case studies of joint working are small in nature, Birmingham is the largest local authority in Europe – so this paper also contributes learning based on trying to develop joint working in very large, complex authorities.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Public Administration,Sociology and Political Science,Health(social science)

Reference6 articles.

1. Birmingham City Council (2014), Social Care for Adults in Birmingham: A Fair Deal in Times of Austerity , Birmingham City Council, Birmingham.

2. Birmingham Health and Well-being Board (2012), An Overview of the Joint Strategic Needs Assessment for Birmingham , Birmingham Health and Well-being Board, Birmingham.

3. Kerslake, B. (2014), The Way Forward: An Independent Review of the Governance and Organisational Capabilities of Birmingham City Council , HMSO, London.

4. Lotinga, A. and Glasby, J. (2012), “New conversations with new players? The relationship between primary care and social care in an era of clinical commissioning”, Journal of Integrated Care , Vol. 20 No. 3, pp. 175-80.

5. Miller, R. and Gulati, S. (2014), The Evaluation of the Workforce-Delivery Model for Assessment and Support Planning (Birmingham City Council Adult & Communities Directorate) , Health Services Management Centre, University of Birmingham, Birmingham.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3