Abstract
Purpose
– With the advent of Clinical Commissioning Groups, the English health system has abolished more managerially led Primary Care Trusts and given greater responsibilities to groups of local general practitioners (GPs). As with all major changes, this brings both opportunities and risks, and the authors know relatively little about what impact this might have on relationships between the NHS and local government. Against this background, the purpose of this paper is to report key findings from a scoping review commissioned by the National Institute of Health Research School for Social Care Research in order to summarise learning from recent literature.
Design/methodology/approach
– The paper is based on a review of the literature on older people’s services and the relationship between general practice and adult social care, published in the UK from 2000 onwards.
Findings
– Despite the longstanding nature of the issues at stake, the review identified only nine relevant studies. These were of mixed quality, and tended to focus on lessons learned from the late 1990s/early 2000s rather than more recent reforms. Overall, these studies suggest similar barriers to those identified in previous policy contexts, and there is a strong sense of relationships starting from a low base (hence the title of our title of “new conversations between old players”).
Research limitations/implications
– This review is based on literature on older people’s services published since 2000 – so only provides a snapshot of the issues at stake. However, it confirms the relatively limited nature of the evidence base and the need for new research to help shape future policy and practice.
Originality/value
– Despite the central contribution of GPs, the authors still know relatively little about the relationship between general practice and adult social care. Reviewing previous literature (however, limited) is crucial to current attempts to develop more effective joint working at local level.
Subject
Public Administration,Sociology and Political Science,Health(social science)
Reference23 articles.
1. Banyard, R.
,
Jones, H.T.
,
Hampshaw, S.
and
Dunn, A.
(2002), “Social skills”,
Health Service Journal
, Vol. 112 No. 5820, pp. 24-25.
2. Brown, L.
,
Tucker, C.
and
Domokos, T.
(2003), “Evaluating the impact of integrated health and social care teams on older people living in the community”,
Health and Social Care in the Community
, Vol. 11 No. 2, pp. 85-94.
3. Coleman, A.
and
Rummery, K.
(2003), “Social services representation in primary care groups and trusts”,
Journal of Interprofessional Care
, Vol. 17 No. 3, pp. 273-280.
4. Corney, R.H.
and
Clare, A.W.
(Eds) (1982),
Social Work and Primary Health Care
, Academic Press, London.
5. Davey, B.
,
Levin, E.
,
Iliffe, S.
and
Kharicha, K.
(2005), “Integrating health and social care: implications for joint working and community care outcomes for older people”,
Journal of Interprofessional Care
, Vol. 19 No. 1, pp. 22-34.
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献