Arab scholars’ acceptance of informal scholarly communication tools: applying the technology acceptance model 2 (TAM2)

Author:

Alwreikat Asma,Shehata Ahmed Maher Khafaga,Abu Zaid Mohammed Khair

Abstract

Purpose This paper aims to use the technology acceptance model 2 (TAM2) to investigate the perceived ease of use, perceived benefits, barriers to use and acceptance of Arab scholars of informal communication tools in research writing. Design/methodology/approach This study adopted a quantitative approach using a questionnaire distributed among Arab scholars in Jordan, Egypt and Oman. The questionnaire based on the TAM2 model aimed to measure the acceptance of the sample of informal scholarly communication tools. Findings The study’s findings confirmed that the sample is considering informal scholarly communication tools are useful for their research. Informal scholarly communication tools increase the papers’ visibility, leading to a higher number of citations, building scholars’ reputation, creating new collaboration opportunities and maintaining the established collaboration. Research limitations/implications The study’s findings can only be generalized on Arab scholars. The sample size could be one of the limitations, and the sample’s distribution was limited to three Arab universities in Jordan, Oman and Egypt. The authors recommend that future researchers use TAM2 model as a framework for studying the adoption of informal scholarly communication tools in different cultural contexts to achieve a better understanding of factors influencing the adoption of such tools. Practical implications A practical implication of this research is in drawing the attention of higher education institutions for the potentials of these scholarly communication tools in increasing the availability of publications of their scholars and increasing the citation of these publications, which would help in increasing the ranking of scholars, and the rank of these institutions which opens new opportunities of international research collaboration. Social implications The outcomes of this research have several implications for the successful adoption of the TAM2 model. This study brings new knowledge to the literature related to informal scholarly communication adoption by the application of TAM2 constructs to determine the adoption behavior; the findings offered evidence of the TAM2 success in predicting adoption of such tools. Originality/value To the best of the authors’ knowledge, adopting TAM2 in this research will add to knowledge by being one of the first studies to adopt TAM2 to measure acceptance of informal scholarly communication tools.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Library and Information Sciences

Reference71 articles.

1. Impact of social networking tools on scholarly communication: a cross-institutional study;The Electronic Library,2015

2. Use of social media by social science academics for scholarly communication;Global Knowledge, Memory and Communication,2018

3. Perceptions regarding academic social networks for scholarly communications;Global Knowledge, Memory and Communication,2020

4. Cross-cultural differences in the in adoption of social media;Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing,2019

5. Determinants of Facebook use among students and its impact on collaborative learning;Information Development,2021

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Research on Promoting the Upgrading Path Development of the Equipment Manufacturing Industry by Using Information Technology;International Journal of Decision Support System Technology;2024-08-15

2. What Influences Citizen Use of a Digital National Property Addressing System?;Advances in IT Standards and Standardization Research;2024-02-23

3. Modeling the influence of online communities and social commerce;Global Knowledge, Memory and Communication;2024-01-02

4. The evolution and development landscape of scholarly communication based on the analysis of published articles;Journal of Librarianship and Information Science;2023-09-05

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3