Meta-cognitive impairment in processing ingredients: the effects of jargon, list length and aids on young consumers’ evaluations of cosmetic products

Author:

Özdinç Yalım

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to examine the nonidentical impacts of identical panel information that discloses cosmetic ingredients by their English (i.e. low jargon; e.g. vitamin E) versus scientific names (i.e. high jargon; tocopherol instead) presented in short versus crowded panel on young consumers’ confidence in processing ingredients information and product judgements. In the same context, this study also explores the effects of declarative aids provided within the ingredients panel. Design/methodology/approach This study conducted four experiments by using a 2 (jargon: high, low) × 2 (ingredients list: short, long) between-subjects analysis of variance design. Findings Young consumers’ processing-confidence and product evaluations increase (decrease) when the panel is brief (crowded) and presents cosmetic ingredients in low (high) jargon (Experiments 1, 2). However, when it discloses a factual aid [i.e. ingredient functions; e.g. tocopherol (antioxidant)], confidence in processing even the high-jargon information, as well as product judgements, increases irrespective of the panel’s length (Experiment 3). Moreover, a fictitious aid (e.g. dryness-fighting “atomic robots”) stimulates the same effect and bolsters processing confidence and product evaluations irrespective of both jargon and panel’s length (Experiment 4). Originality/value Despite their heavy use of over-the-counter beauty/cosmetic products, little do we know how young consumers consult and use on-pack ingredients information provided in one format versus the other. To the best of the author’s knowledge, this study is the first experimental work investigating the cosmetics-consuming youth’s reactions to panel format and aids to processing.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Life-span and Life-course Studies,Economics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous)

Reference52 articles.

1. Ameritrade (2017), “Summer jobs and internships survey: teens and millennials join the workforce”, available at: http://s1.q4cdn.com/959385532/files/doc_downloads/research/2017/Summer-Jobs-and-Internships.pdf (accessed 30 January 2021).

2. Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (2018), “Product safety: ingredients labelling on cosmetics”, available at: www.productsafety.gov.au/system/files/731_Ingredients%20labelling%20on%20cosmetics_Supplier%20Guide_FA5.pdf (accessed 29 January 2021).

3. Constructive consumer choice processes;Journal of Consumer Research,1998

4. Jargon as a barrier to effective science communication: evidence from metacognition;Public Understanding of Science,2019

5. Bubphapant, J. and Thammasaro, R. (2012), “The effects of online third-party opinions toward consumer purchasing decision on cosmetic products in the thai market”, master thesis, School of Sustainable Development of Society and Technology, Mälardalen University, Sweden, 4 June.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3