The concept of knowledge in KM: a dimensional model

Author:

Meyer Bertolt,Sugiyama Kozo

Abstract

PurposeThis paper seeks to sharpen the concepts of tacit, implicit and explicit knowledge by linking them to findings from cognitive psychology and memory science and thus finding a possibility for measuring non‐explicit knowledge.Design/methodology/approachA review of KM and cognitive science literature leads to a dimensional model of knowledge types that links the concepts from KM to more specific concepts from psychology. One central assumption of the model was empirically tested and put into practice in one small‐scale KM project.FindingsThe concepts in KM can be linked to concepts from psychology and thus receive theoretical support. The developed model enables psychometric access to a part of non‐explicit knowledge through structural assessment techniques. Furthermore, the model has proven to be of value in a practical application in KM.Research limitations/implicationsThe experiment and the practical application are too small in scope to provide full support for the model. Further research is required.Practical implicationsA fraction of non‐explicit knowledge can be measured with structural assessment techniques. This can be used in the quantitative evaluation of KM projects as these techniques allow the quantification of individual knowledge increase. Furthermore, a detailed analysis of individual project‐relevant knowledge is useful for post‐project analysis.Originality/valueThe paper integrates findings from several scientific fields for use in KM and presents a novel view of classic KM concepts. The developed model is of importance to both researchers and practitioners.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Management of Technology and Innovation,Strategy and Management

Reference72 articles.

1. Amelingmeyer, J. (2004), Wissensmanagement: Analyse und Gestaltung der Wissensbasis von Unternehmen, 3rd ed. (in German), Dt. Univ.‐Verl., Wiesbaden.

2. Argyris, C. and Schön, D.A. (1999), Die Lernende Organisation: Grundlagen, Methode, Praxis (in German), Klett, Stuttgart.

3. Busch, P.A., Richards, D. and Dampney, C.N.G. (2001), “Visual mapping of articulable tacit knowledge”, in Eades, P. and Pattison, T. (Eds), Australasian Symposium on Information Visualization, December 2001: Conferences in Research and Practice in Information Technology, Sydney, Australia, 3‐4 December, Vol. 9, Australian Computer Society, Sydney, pp. 37‐47.

4. Damerow, P. and Lefèvre, W. (1998), “Wissenssysteme im geschichtlichen Wandel”, in Klix, F. and Spada, H. (Eds), Enzyklopädie der Psychologie, Vol. 6: Kognition, Hogrefe, Göttingen, pp. 77‐114.

5. Davenport, T.H. and Prusak, L. (1998), Working Knowledge: How Organizations Manage What They Know, Harvard Business School Press, Cambridge, MA.

Cited by 28 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3